Since the hunter gathered time until current modern times, rules played vital roled in each society. Nowadays, many are adamant that should be taken in to consideration in order to examine its constructive and desturctive facets of this matter. Some people may hold the view that the young people should respect the rules and obey it. Others, however, take an opposide view and think that since the world is changing and why the rules should not change. From my vantage point, I concur with the latter group and the lines below will shed on light my viewpoint.
First of all, first equisite point to be mention is that the importance of new ideas. Today, we are in computers world which continuesly developing. There are many invention which have relation with complex computers languange. Due to this complex world, society help the young and set up new regulation rather preventing them. A vivid example which can be give to subject is new tax regulation in my country. According to these regulations, computers programmers pay less tax. Consequently, Our goverment try to encourage the new generation to come up with new ideas.
Secondly, in aproaching this issue, apart from what mentioned above, there is another subtle point which must be borne in mind. A noteworthy refreshingly intelliagible statistic reveals by a recent research conducted in our country show that generation x is much more creative than milleanials thanks to exposing new technologies. Becaue of this reason, big companies pay attention their ideas and bring them significant positions. Therefore, companies promote workers who under age of 30.
Although, the aforementioned reasons are the first ones which cross the mind at first glance, there are by no means only reasons available. In our modern world, we are in a ongoing proccess which the new rules are written. So this means, Old rules can change since they have old persfective. Morever, production styles, people and even industries change. We need new rules.
To wrap up, from the reason which i wrtoe above, one can conculed that the rules can change while the understanding of people change. I think countries should respect the young people and should not force them to obey the rules.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun invention seems to be countable; consider using: 'many inventions'.
Suggestion: many inventions
...which continuesly developing. There are many invention which have relation with complex comput...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...promote workers who under age of 30. Although, the aforementioned reasons are the fir...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ailable. In our modern world, we are in a ongoing proccess which the new rules ar...
^
Line 7, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hange. We need new rules. To wrap up, from the reason which i wrtoe above, one...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, apart from, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 52.1666666667 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 271.0 407.700716846 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17712177122 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82791678256 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616236162362 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 618.680645161 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.709929477 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.8421052632 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2631578947 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15789473684 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0947266825723 0.236089414692 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291189380402 0.076458572812 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0252364977052 0.0737576698707 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0628347457258 0.150856017488 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360540177718 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.17 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.