Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Successful leaders should make others part of the decision-making process.
It is universally acknowledged that an effective leader is supposed to make his team members feel they are important for the decision making process, as it can not only encourage them to buckle down, but also respect their leader more sincerely. I am a big believer of this argument and I do think the benefits from this feeling can elevate the quality of the team’s assignments.
Admittedly, the leader is the one who has relatively more experiences to be successful so they always make all of the decision. For example, they always determine whether their result of discussions could be applied or which is the right track suiting this team well to get on. However, if properly making team members realize themselves crucial for the decision making, leaders can relieve his burden and develop the teamwork easily.
For starts, sharing the responsibility is an efficient way to develop the quality of team works. Chances are high that a leader may have assumed so many workloads that he is facing a great deal of pressures, as he the only one to make the decision. Chances are also high that some young team members may have more creative opinions than their conventional leader. In this situation, the leader need to do is to let his team members do share the responsibility of the decision making. After feeling they are of vital necessity, members will make every effort to develop the quality of assignments. Sometimes it is the case that the earlier they have such feeling of value, the more opportunities the team has to have access to the success. Therefore, it is common to see some team members regard the collective success as their own benefits worthwhile to buckle down.
In addition, making team members feel part of decision making attracts more elites. This can be reflected by research conducted by Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) suggesting that a large proportion of (about two thirds) participants, mainly elites with ages ranging from 22-35, have shown strong eagerness of decision making because they assume this process gives them more opportunities to promote and increase their salaries. That is, according to researchers, companies are highly likely to attract more elites by means of increasing their components to make decisions. The experience of Apple Corporation can be a compelling case of this point. Before designing and releasing new products, Steve Jobs always held a meeting, selecting 100 of the most excellent employees to attend, to have a brainstorm and choose 10 schemes. Finally, Jobs would adopt 3 of these schemes. It is this feeling of participating that attracts an increasing number of elites looking forward to enter Apple Corporation significantly.
In conclusion, though leaders may have more experiences compared to team members, they should share the responsibilities of decision making because it is an efficient way to develop the quality of team works and attract more elites.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...es to be successful so they always make all of the decision. For example, they always dete...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 971, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[7]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'to entering'.
Suggestion: to entering
...easing number of elites looking forward to enter Apple Corporation significantly. In ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, third, well, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2466.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11618257261 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8484109634 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491701244813 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 771.3 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0081244843 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.3 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208110635564 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710563980815 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710384502208 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135760940131 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164683278388 0.0645574589148 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.