Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? University should spend more money supporting social activities rather than improving the canteen food.
Undoubtedly, in a broad spectrum, strategies for expenditure are one of the main decisive parameters in a successful system. Schools, universities, companies are examples of a system in which profit spending gets more highlighted because of the limited resources. Universities in particular, are one of the most critical organizations that have profound impact on the future of a society, as a result, university policies can make big differences. Among the diverse fields of investment in a university, group activites are of great importance because of the positive effects they have on different aspects of students’ lives. This influential factor outweighs a good campus food service indisputably.
To begin with, universities are like small social communities in which people attend to get prepared for the real big society. Beside the professional educational courses that students are obliged to pass to get graduated, there are voluntary additional social activites. While many ignore the side works, many subscribe to the idea that the gained knowledge through these jobs is worth gold. Importance of the social activities is not revealed unless students enter to their future job and family life. expeditions, exhibitions, introduction to industries, group activities, collaborations in team works, social relationships, intellectual values constitute these programs. This fact should encourage university deans to pay more attention to these programs, although students play the most remarkable role in these activities, a firm financial support would improve the level of the activities radically.
Secondly, however quality of the food that is served to students is crucial in students’ well-being, it can be done in a different way. University restaurants are strictly controlled by standard institutions in order to have a moderate standard at least. Thus spending lots of money to improve the food quailty to a premium level is nothing but a lavish spending. This decision will put the profit allocated for the other indispensable activities in a risk. Another tactic to provide high quality food is building several cafeterias in which students have a wide option for choose.
To put in a nutshell, Although a comprehensive strategy encloses all aspects of student’s life, some of them are more critical. fundamental effects that social activities serve students are precious and deniable in their future life.
Comments
Essay evaluation report by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Expeditions
...er to their future job and family life. expeditions, exhibitions, introduction to industrie...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...udents' well-being, it can be done in a different way. University restaurants are strictly co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Fundamental
...s life, some of them are more critical. fundamental effects that social activities serve st...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, at least, in particular, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60916442049 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22664139341 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582210242588 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3382599446 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.611111111 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6111111111 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174627550421 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501762738857 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423353179174 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966746595188 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323253373763 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Expeditions
...er to their future job and family life. expeditions, exhibitions, introduction to industrie...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...udents' well-being, it can be done in a different way. University restaurants are strictly co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 134, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Fundamental
...s life, some of them are more critical. fundamental effects that social activities serve st...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, at least, in particular, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 371.0 407.700716846 91% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60916442049 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22664139341 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582210242588 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3382599446 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.611111111 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6111111111 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174627550421 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501762738857 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423353179174 0.0737576698707 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966746595188 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323253373763 0.0645574589148 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 58.1214874552 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.1575268817 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.01818996416 122% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.