Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country?
Nowadays, in this hectic era which human kinds are living, there are a significant increase in the demand for learning about different countries owing to different reasons such as migration, traveling, and education, to name but a few. Although a substantial amount of people strongly believe that visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country, I firmly disagree with this widespread point of view. I take the view that movies and history books can talk about a country loudly.
First, movies can give monumental amount of information about a country’s culture. I take the view that movies not museums talk loudly about a countries culture. To illustrate, I had not have any information about South Korea until I saw a movie which was made in this country. Having seen the movie, I realized South Korea is a country whose people nurture love and try to enrich their relationship with their family members. In addition, by watching the movie, I understood what they eat. Besides, some social etiquette were mentioned during the movies which enrich my information about the country. In a word, the more movies we watch, the higher information we would have about a country.
Second, another way for learning about a country is reading the history of the country. In my reckoning, we cannot judge or honor truly without having information about the history of the country inasmuch as everything rooted is something deeper. To pave the way for this reason, I would like to give an example of this. German which is well-developed country was in extremely catastrophic condition after world war, but because of good strategies and too hard-work people the country is famous for lots of development. If I do not have any information about the history of German, I would have not been able to grasp the importance of their progresses in wide range of field. Hence, never do we able to fully learn about a country without knowing what has happened for the country through history.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...tries culture. To illustrate, I had not have any information about South Korea until...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, hence, if, second, so, well, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93154761905 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7225343934 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5904038237 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5625 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26633039279 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958838742616 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794958038479 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194980604081 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651698456137 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.