Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? We can learn about a person from the books and movies which this person likes.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that people have always put their efforts and bend over backward so as to get to know more and more people with various attitudes and passions in their personal lives. Various points of view which are germane to the matter being discussed brings us to the moot question as to whether people could get to know each other by considering books and movies, they are really interested in. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that there is nothing to do with books and movies because they vary greatly. Instead, people should try to know each other by spending time. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, relationships do not form, materialize and maintain themselves and they are not built on a foundation of convenience, either. Generally phrased, people need to become familiar with each other in order to continue their lives successfully. By books and movies, people might not be able to know others deeply and completely. Indeed, they should try to spend most of their time with other humans in order to improve their cognitive ability. As a tangible example, in today's hectic city of life, there is no veracity, fidelity, trustworthy, integrity, sympathy, comradeship, morale and so forth. With the absence of these hallmarks, it's hard to get to know people by books or movies. Hardly can we become familiar deeply if we rely on books and movies. To elucidate more on this issue, people have to spend their precious time with other people, going out to a fancy restaurant, clubs, and national parks and so on, to get to know each other thoroughly. Otherwise, their relationships might not be lasting.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance is that social media play a key role when it comes to learning about people. If we take a minute to ponder over it, vast majorities of people have now accounts in social media like Instagram, telegram, tweeter and so forth. Although they might not be able to give us complete information about people, at least we could become familiar and learn about people's behaviors and manner. For instance, one of my close friends always posted me texts about being shrewd and diligent. So, I found that he is a shrewd person and has a hard-working attitude in doing his duties. It can be deduced from a combination of coverage and depth of detail that by social media not only can people get to know each other but also can keep in close contact and improve the circle of friendship.
However, every coin has two sides. Books and movies are able to help us to know other people characteristics. Based on research conducted at the California University, people watch movies and read books according to their taste and these tastes could be about aggressiveness, horrific, veracity, compassionate and so forth. These taste could provide an opportunity for people to learn about crowds of people. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal perspective.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ut their efforts and bend over backward so as to get to know more and more people with v...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...iscussed brings us to the moot question as to whether people could get to know each other by ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, really, so, as to, at least, for instance, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 13.8261648746 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 93.0 52.1666666667 178% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2671.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 547.0 407.700716846 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88299817185 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69053031459 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497257769653 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 827.1 618.680645161 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5830936863 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.730769231 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0384615385 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42307692308 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202897626845 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570861941034 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043827955271 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106809443559 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056000254792 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.