Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Workers would be much happier if they are doing different types of tasks at the same time than doing the same task.
Under the amelioration of people's living standards, the flourishing industries have made workers' working tempo quicken. Considering such a situation, in order to improve working efficiency of workers, there is a statement be discussed that employers should do the different types of tasks at the same time. On the one hand, some people agree with this since they think it is helpful to to keep workers' minds refreshed. However, a considerate number of people on the opposite, which workers should do the same task. I totally agree this statement. I believe, comparing with the multitasking, doing the one task at sametime could be more positive to workers' efficiency.
Firstly, the ability of concentrating oneself is the most vital quality to a worker. Without a focused attention, the task would be easily interupted by many distractions in the real working process, which may lead some serious mistakes. For example,
Secondly, It's self-evident that staying focused could help people improve there productivity a lot, which means the economic profits of employees could rise. The more efficient workers doing tasks, the more time was saved and more money was earned. As far as this point, the study from the Faculty of Management and Human Resources at University of Amsterdam showed that, for the workers at on industry, the level of their concentration is linearly related to the the its productivity. On the other hand, the multitasking will exert a negative effect on the work. In this way
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...ith this since they think it is helpful to to keep workers minds refreshed. However, ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lead some serious mistakes. For example, Secondly, Its self-evident that staying ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 461, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ir concentration is linearly related to the the its productivity. On the other hand, th...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 461, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ir concentration is linearly related to the the its productivity. On the other hand, th...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 465, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
...oncentration is linearly related to the the its productivity. On the other hand, the mu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1259.0 1977.66487455 64% => OK
No of words: 244.0 407.700716846 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15983606557 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87375167155 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 618.680645161 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4104168739 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8461538462 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7692307692 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33217785678 0.236089414692 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106455219269 0.076458572812 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110593070205 0.0737576698707 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197008115935 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15591441936 0.0645574589148 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.