Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Good teachers set challenging tasks for their students.
Good mentors definitely set challenging tasks for their students. Teachers build hurdles in the students easy going. It helps them to enhance their life as well as grow into a versatile individual. There are several reasons for which challenging tasks shall prove benign. I agree to the statement if it completely aids to a student's learning and development.
When teachers allot challenging work to their student, they make a step towards making the student a more strong and ready for other such difficult tasks. By performing such tasks student can become immune to any other practical situation. They do not feel afraid of any further difficult situation. Good teachers think wisely and therefore set such tasks to help students grow and face any tasks.
Students under the guidance of such teachers makes them more confident to solve problems of real life. Whereas, other students who do not have guidance of good teachers may not have such concrete foundation. Students who are ready to face these challenging tasks are more likely to success. But, remaining might be afraid of the situation themselves.
Teacher plays a major part in the development of an individual. They should provide beneficial challenging tasks. Tasks that are challenging and not beneficial, then the teacher might not be classified as good mentor. The tasks that do not have a positive effect may even be deleterious. More tough situation might dishearten the individual. The mentor must make sure that the task has an positive outcome.
Good teachers set tough tasks to increase their intellectual and problem solving capacity. A teacher may be truly helping to shape future by providing these tasks. And, therefore they are called good. Good teachers set hurdles to make the student adaptable to any harsh situation in future. And that obviously makes them more strong and confident.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s student can become immune to any other practical situation. They do not feel af...
^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nfident to solve problems of real life. Whereas, other students who do not have guidanc...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 387, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...mentor must make sure that the task has an positive outcome. Good teachers set ...
^^
Line 9, column 281, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...tudent adaptable to any harsh situation in future. And that obviously makes them more str...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 304.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20065789474 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66577900125 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 212.727598566 71% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496710526316 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => Sentence length is too short
Sentence length SD: 24.5525230656 48.9658058833 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.875 100.406767564 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.6666666667 20.6045352989 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.45110844103 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316617037475 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972984771075 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094132037029 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200108083095 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801046323672 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 58.1214874552 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.99 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.