Do you agree or disagree with following statement?
In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Mean of transport is always controversial problem. There are a lot of arguments about saving energy, impact of transports to environment, ... One issue which is also argued very much is producing new mean of transport. It might be done in the period of time when technical and science develop quickly. Some transports can be invented to alter cars, which transport is most modern now. However, in my opinion, car will keep their popular in twenty years later.
Car is a creative invention of human. Creating cars have made standard of life increase very much. Cars is known with a lot of advantages such as avoiding rain, sunlight or even snow, storms. For example, if you must travel a long trip, using car will be a good choice to help you more comfortable and your traveling will be less tired. Besides that, when you have your own car, you can ride your car whenever you need, you must not depend on climate like using motorbikes or time like using public transports. Although car is expensive now, it is a disadvantage of car, car companies are working hard to make their product is both cheaper and less environmental pollution. In the future, it is possible that almost people can afford to use cars. In general, cars even are used more than now.
Additionally, besides advantages in daily life, car is a necessary thing that people should have in modern life. Car is always symbol of luxury and success. People use car as a way help their work going better. Imaging, if you are investing in a project or a company, leader of company use a car will make you feel more trust than when this leader goes to meet you by bus.
Some people can say that there will be varieties of new transports which are invented in the future have more advantages and more luxury than car. I also believe that, however, I claim that it cannot be in twenty year. In order to create an ideal transport like cars, it will not take some decades. In basically, cars will still keep their popular for a long time.
In conclusion, I want to repeat all advantages that cars bring to human. The benefits of using car in life is not denied. Even twenty years later, it can be having more transport with a lot of benefit, but it is not mean car companies are not movement. From my perspective, I believe that in the future, cars even have more positive than now. As a result, there is not any reasons why people do not use car more than now.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...n of transport. It might be done in the period of time when technical and science develop quic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 302, Rule ID: YOUR[1]
Message: Did you mean 'you're' or 'you are'?
Suggestion: you're; you are
...choice to help you more comfortable and your traveling will be less tired. Besides t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 238, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'ideal transport'.
Suggestion: ideal transport
...t be in twenty year. In order to create an ideal transport like cars, it will not take some decade...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ll keep their popular for a long time. In conclusion, I want to repeat all advant...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, still, for example, in conclusion, in general, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5296803653 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44285246964 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474885844749 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.652438137 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.4814814815 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2222222222 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.40740740741 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276327557728 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818860420975 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605348454254 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169750562685 0.150856017488 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599732173175 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 11.7677419355 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.002688172 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.