Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In these days there has been much controversy about the teachers role and caused quite a stir in numerous circles and camps .Different people may give various types of responses to this question based upon their social, cultural or even familial backgrounds. Although majority of people contemplate that teachers are respected much by people in order to value growth of education and academic studies in modern day, others posits that teachers role pale in compared to past as a result of modern technology and people’s involvement. Many factors interact together to enable us to estimate the teachers status in the modern community. However, when it comes to me, I conspicuously declare that, teachers are respected less in the present time in comparison with past on account of the following reasons.
To begin with, it is a common phenomenon that Internet diminishes teacher’s responsibility and duties A brief investigation reveals that the most powerful engine such as YOUTUBE and WIKIPEDIS meet the demands of not only the students of schools and university but also adults. These engines embody a wide variety of tutorial subjects and videos from mathematical theories to workout. Students reliant on their teachers are lost since they do not need sophisticated teachers to response to their bizarre question and teach them trick of mathematical problems. They need just a computer or laptop and Internet to search on it and absorb any hypothesis or solution. In addition, adult’s dependence on professional instructor and tutors are declining. Take an example of an individual who wants to do some exercise to lose weight. Indeed, they could search on the YOUTUBE and download the live workout and sport with the on-line coach. As a result, the initial cause of less admire seems to have been less contribution in the society and the access of Internet and vast number of information to learn.
Last but not least, with the development of machinery life, our community and today’s people are confronted with more complicated issues and as a result less time are devote to admire teachers. Our ancestor’s life has been streamlined in order to absence of new technology. A precise assessment in this realm reveals that, residents of large city in particular capital’s country are obliged to work hard to earn money even they do not have time to visit their family. Our society faces catastrophic issues every day such as addiction, unemployment and corruption and government make an endeavor to find a tactic to reduce the pressure. Consequently, no time remains for holding for example a commemorating to appreciate motivated teachers and professors. .
To put it in a nutshell, I restate that, a growing body of evidence supports this inevitable fact that teacher’s duty loses significance more and more. Back to the beginning controversial question, I cite a clear bias in favor of this indisputable fact that people’s requirement of master teachers has gone in order to access to huge volume of information in the Internet and time deficit for both society rubs the chance for respecting teachers in order to our machinery life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ere has been much controversy about the teachers role and caused quite a stir in numerou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ite a stir in numerous circles and camps .Different people may give various types ...
^^
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Different
...e a stir in numerous circles and camps .Different people may give various types of respon...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...udies in modern day, others posits that teachers role pale in compared to past as a resu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 600, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...t together to enable us to estimate the teachers status in the modern community. However...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...teacher's responsibility and duties A brief investigation reveals that the m...
^^^
Line 2, column 1112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd vast number of information to learn. Last but not least, with the development...
^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'devoted'.
Suggestion: devoted
...ed issues and as a result less time are devote to admire teachers. Our ancestor's...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 771, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iate motivated teachers and professors. . To put it in a nutshell, I restate t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 793, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s and professors. . To put it in a nutshell, I restate th...
^^
Line 4, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eachers in order to our machinery life.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, so, for example, in addition, in particular, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 13.8261648746 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 52.1666666667 161% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2675.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 512.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.224609375 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05162812533 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 212.727598566 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5546875 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 856.8 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.3701955536 48.9658058833 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.789473684 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9473684211 20.6045352989 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161306587613 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471148779464 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311912569062 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.095468678852 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00674628275825 0.0645574589148 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 11.7677419355 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 58.1214874552 63% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 148.0 86.8835125448 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.