Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The world has a changing style, friendship plays a crucial role in anybody's happiness in life, since they will be in need of comfort and support to encounter with this changes. With this in mind, a debate exists whether a long-time friendship is more important for people's joyfulness or to be able of making many new friends. As far as I am concerned, it is essential to have well-established friends, even if they are small in amount, because of several reasons, two of which are of great importance in comparison to others, which are elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, it is crystal clear that, when any individual has a friend for a long time, they will know the behaviors and "yes-or-no" of each other in an involved manner. For example, a long run friend is more welcomed to people's home as compared to a new friend, since people are more comfortable with their "BFF" than their new friend, preferences of whom they do not know as well as their old friend. Therefore, friends who are in their lives for more amount of time are more likely to make them happy. People have some instinctive behaviors which cannot be changed, a person who is a long run friend had made this clear that this behaviors does not bother neither sides of the friendship. Hence, any individual may seem happier when they are near they old friends. In contrast, every new relationship may have its debates about several things, such as their hobbies, their bad behaviors, and even the genre of the movie they want to watch together, to name but a few. Obviously, this kind of controversies can make anybody uncomfortable and unhappy in a long run.
Secondly, in today's world, people are more concerned about the problems of their own other than their friends or even families. Moreover, there are fewer people, who can establish a long time relation, in which the both side be happy and satisfied. Despite the fact that it is possible for people to make a new friend as lovable as old friends, it is rare to be so lucky that you find a friend, who are willing to be with each other, whether or not it is beneficial for them too. It is worth mentioning that a well-established friendship is the one, in which people are with each other through thin and thick of their lives, no matter what is the fruit of this relation for them. There is a saying, which equivalent in English may sound like, " See who stood by you in ups and downs." Additionally, with the passage of time, people will recognize their true friends, since they will have downs along their lives and they will see who was beside them during the bad times. On the other hand, it is more common in new friendships that a person will not put their friend's need above them, which is more prevalent in the long-timed friendships.
To sum up, by taking into account all aforementioned factors, we can depict that even a small number of close and long-time friends are more consequential for people as compared to having many new friends. I, personally, hope that people be able to maintain a friendship and not take their close friends for granted, as they will be supporting and comforting for each other.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...f comfort and support to encounter with this changes. With this in mind, a debate ex...
^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an involved manner" with adverb for "involved"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...and 'yes-or-no' of each other in an involved manner. For example, a long run friend is more...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
..., a long run friend is more welcomed to peoples home as compared to a new friend, since...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 652, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ong run friend had made this clear that this behaviors does not bother neither sides...
^^^^
Line 6, column 435, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... who are willing to be with each other, whether or not it is beneficial for them too. It is wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 87, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...tioned factors, we can depict that even a small number of close and long-time friends are more co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in contrast, kind of, such as, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 15.1003584229 232% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.0286738351 218% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2633.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 560.0 407.700716846 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70178571429 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.8645985582 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75437905055 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466071428571 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 795.6 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 4.94265232975 344% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.5254504025 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.277777778 100.406767564 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1111111111 20.6045352989 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38888888889 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272039595347 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10752867149 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727039310827 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19812461241 0.150856017488 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00412218446333 0.0645574589148 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 58.1214874552 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.