Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
do you think strict rules are the best approach to maintain regularity? In the contemporary world, with the galloping rate, at which science and technology are flourishing, there are different theories about what is the best approach and method to keep up regularity in the society. Insightfully, answering the question of whether having strict rules are beneficial or not can provoke imminent controversies owing to a variety of factors contributing to the formation of a multidimensional viewpoint involving careful analysis. A number of people are in the conviction that strict rules are necessary to maintain discipline in the society. Their supposition is at odds with some others' from another camp embracing the view that having too strict rules influence societies in a negative way; in fact, from my vantage point, the latter carries more weight. reasons directing me toward this belief are manifold, but two conspicuous of which are: strict rules cause irregularity, and they cause conflicts, upon which I elaborated the following paragraphs.
First and foremost, one cogent reason corroborating my deduction is that having too strict rules and forcing people to follow them do not maintain regularity. Indeed, people react to these rules in a negative way. Throughout history, posing strict rules on people, cause them to do what is restricted even more than they used to. For instance, imagine that parents tell their young child that he is not allowed to go to the playground, he loves the most, anymore. what would be the result? Probably, the kid would not be happy with his parents' decision and tends to go to this playground even more than before. Ergo, it can be readily confirmed that posing strict rules on people cause them to react in the opposite way.
Second compelling reason deserving some words here is that forcing people to obey some certain rules, can provoke conflicts. people would not be happy with new rules, and they may protest against these rules and government. For example, last year in my home country, Iran, the government passed a new law, based on which stores are not allowed to sell a specific soap anymore. people did not like this decision since they believed that they should be allowed to buy and consume whatever they want. consequently, people protested against this decision, which led to chaos. Thus, the government should be careful about the consequences of the new laws they pass in society.
All in all, if the above discussion is contemplated, it can be easily concluded that forcing people to obey strict rules not only is not advantageous but also it can cause chaos in society. last but not least, it is suggested that governments explain the reasons why they are expecting people, especially young people, to obey the new rules.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Do
do you think strict rules are the best app...
^^
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...in the society. Insightfully, answering the question of whether having strict rules are beneficial or n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 773, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ng too strict rules influence societies in a negative way; in fact, from my vantage point, the la...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 856, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Reasons
... point, the latter carries more weight. reasons directing me toward this belief are man...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ty. Indeed, people react to these rules in a negative way. Throughout history, posing strict rule...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 465, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...playground, he loves the most, anymore. what would be the result? Probably, the kid ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 126, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...e certain rules, can provoke conflicts. people would not be happy with new rules, and ...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 378, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...llowed to sell a specific soap anymore. people did not like this decision since they b...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 499, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
... to buy and consume whatever they want. consequently, people protested against this decision...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 19, column 191, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Last
...but also it can cause chaos in society. last but not least, it is suggested that gov...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, thus, for example, for instance, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 15.1003584229 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2353.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10412147505 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73882798055 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496746203905 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 719.1 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.652271209 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.047619048 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9523809524 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243029134988 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719545012039 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530710978616 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146908359655 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454233947029 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.