Most of the people believe that youth have no influence on vital decisions that affect the future of society. My opinion, however, is against them. Young people as important members of every country have enough power to change the situations. They are assertive to try new things and learn new technologies and by installing their knowledge can get better results. Thinking about the society's future without the effect of young people is impossible.
First, young people have more incentive to change bad situations. They want to live in the better circumstances and know it depends on their affords. So the society' future is the youth's future. The country with active and ambitious people has more opportunity to enhance. For example, children in school think about their future job and set a plan to achieve.
Second, due to the advent of new technologies, young people have more convenient to progress and they are keep going with this surge. Obviously, youths have more potential to conform themselves with these new devices and technologies. They bring society more chance to improve and by this way, administration of country can make better decisions for future.
Finally, every decision of the future of society needs people to do it. for instance, one country decides to make a new hospital so they need workers and engineers as well. If administration's negate young people, they can not reach their goals because youths must help them.
To sum up, I think that young people are vital elements of every society. They responsible for the future of a country and as a result their future. Each country that trusts youths and provides them more facility eventually gets a better result and improve quickly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: KNOW_NOW[4]
Message: Did you mean 'now'?
Suggestion: now
...to live in the better circumstances and know it depends on their affords. So the soc...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'well', 'for example', 'for instance', 'i think', 'as a result', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234920634921 0.229887763892 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.152380952381 0.158761421928 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.120634920635 0.0866891130778 139% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0349206349206 0.046263068375 75% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0634920634921 0.0685040099705 93% => OK
Prepositions: 0.111111111111 0.118717715034 94% => OK
Participles: 0.00952380952381 0.0351676179071 27% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.6169221599 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0412698412698 0.0309702414327 133% => OK
Particles: 0.0031746031746 0.00188951952338 168% => OK
Determiners: 0.0793650793651 0.0887237588012 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0126984126984 0.0209618222197 61% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00634920634921 0.0139019557991 46% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1722.0 2387.08602151 72% => OK
No of words: 284.0 408.028673835 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06338028169 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.48200974243 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.390845070423 0.338922669872 115% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.257042253521 0.251872472559 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.165492957746 0.174417080927 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0950704225352 0.112833075102 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6169221599 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 212.727598566 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.524397521467 99% => OK
Word variations: 51.7340835391 59.2087087015 87% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6684587814 92% => OK
Sentence length: 14.9473684211 20.5533526081 73% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.2471440474 48.84282405 52% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6315789474 120.699889404 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9473684211 20.5533526081 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.631578947368 0.644075263715 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 40.6515937732 45.7405998639 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.41772151899 1.45489161554 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395541378711 0.300154397459 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0683284236739 0.103427244359 66% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0701019993663 0.0752933317313 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.496347236946 0.497263757937 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.117704380143 0.151897553556 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157173908339 0.114077575197 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103658454729 0.0781384742642 133% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.347042837595 0.336927656856 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0372686380879 0.067059652881 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267634563281 0.210909579961 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762968269908 0.0618886996521 123% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.86379928315 26% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.91756272401 142% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.