Dynamic changes in the world make our lives less comfortable.
I strongly agree that dynamic changes in the world make our life complicated, however, it is the fact that the changes are always dynamic in the world. But we should have awareness for the fact of the degree of dynamic changes whether it is rapidly high or rapidly less, rather than it should always be gradual so life will be comfortable.
In fact, the time is always moving forward and all the system, people, animal, plant and universe are evolving day by day. For this, we can say that the changes are always dynamic not constant but we can say whether it is in higher degree or in a lesser degree. I must say, if the changes is gradual but dynamic, life would be much easier. It's all about the adaptation if its gradual. For example, if someone from the very remote area is suddenly brought to the city area where he has never been to, then his life will be much more complicated. But in the same scenario, if he is brought there with proper guidance, helping him to make his mind, then it will much more easier to cope with the situation.
However, it might be the long standing debate whether the world is running with a high degree of dynamic changes or not but I say the world is most of time in gradual dynamic changes. So, people are having a comfortable life at most of the time. But some days in the history like in the world war, natural disaster, sudden downfall of any system, the dynamic changes become so rapid that people's life become so much more complicated even to perform their daily activities.
If the rate of dynamic changes are very less, life will be more complicated. For example, in the remote area of Nepal there are indigenous people living a mundane lifestyle. Whatever they do at night, they do same thing all over their life. So, the dynamic changes is very lesser and having complicated life. Along with this, rapid dynamic changes also makes people's life less comfortable. For, example in the time of war in Nepal, it was very difficult to predict what's going to happen next day. People were unable to plan for the the next day. They have to shift from once place to another place for their security, in search of food and shelter. So, their life goes in a complication in the time of war which can be taken as the rapid dynamic changes.
So, it can be concluded that dynamic changes is always existing in the world. It's not about whether dynamic changes makes people's life difficult or not. But the degree of dynamic changes plays great role in making the life comfortable or bringing predicament in their life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...but dynamic, life would be much easier. Its all about the adaptation if its gradual...
^^^
Line 5, column 665, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...him to make his mind, then it will much more easier to cope with the situation. Howeve...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 466, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...Nepal, it was very difficult to predict whats going to happen next day. People were u...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 529, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ext day. People were unable to plan for the the next day. They have to shift from once ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 529, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ext day. People were unable to plan for the the next day. They have to shift from once ...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 79, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...hanges is always existing in the world. Its not about whether dynamic changes makes...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2108.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56277056277 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30068966107 2.67179642975 86% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415584415584 0.524837075471 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7051038948 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.652173913 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0869565217 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.34782608696 5.45110844103 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327703497834 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109014921779 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120915411135 0.0737576698707 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225602940134 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109111003051 0.0645574589148 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 11.7677419355 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.85 8.01818996416 85% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.