Essay topics: TPO 4, task 2
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
in twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Use reasons and examples to support your response.
There is no doubt that today's advancement in the technology make it possible people to see new cars at the streets. The aforementioned progress causes cars to encounter new changes in the future. This brings up a controversial question surrounding the availability of cars: Is it true to claim that cars will be fewer for use of people in the next twenty years? In my perspective, I think that the cars will dominate in people' future life. The reasons behind this viewpoint are discussed in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, the first reason that immediately comes to mind is that the price of fuel will decrease in the following twenty years. In fact, the oil companies currently are trying to find new way to extract oils such as gasoline efficiently while spending less amount of money. The government are going to discover new places where they have abundant fuels. All of this measures will lead on that the fuels value will drop in the future, which, in turn, will cause people get eager to buy new cars for themselves. As a consequence, the more car will be in use, as the car manufacturer will increase car production.
The second and important reason that support my standpoint is that the price of car will drop in the near future. Indeed, car manufacturers dedicating huge amount of money for improving the process of part production and they do this for lowering the price of car. The researchers such as engineers also, doing several researches in order to invent new techniques for building parts of vehicle rapidly with low costs. If all of these actions succeed, it is likely that car prices get lower in comparison with now. As a result, the demand for purchasing more cars will grow substantially and car companies intend to rise their production rate.
On the other hand, there is a justifications that the cars will become less for use of people. The government will invest money on improving public transportation. For instance, the country of Chine are spending money for developing new devices for improvement of public transportation. Additionally, the companies want to develop new kind of transportation for public use such as a device that are able to fly through the air for the sake of transporting people. However, I still strongly believe that much of this tasks will be unsuccessful and in twenty years later, the need for cars will be higher than today.
In conclusion, according to above-mentioned factors, I contend that the cars will become available for the use of people in the next twenty years due to the drop in price of cars as well as fuels. Is it not fantastic that the poor individuals could afford to purchase a car for themselves?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
There is no doubt that todays advancement in the technology make it p...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 519, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...discussed in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, the first reason that imm...
^^^
Line 2, column 368, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... where they have abundant fuels. All of this measures will lead on that the fuels va...
^^^^
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are a justifications'?
Suggestion: there are a justifications
...ir production rate. On the other hand, there is a justifications that the cars will become less for use ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 29, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a justification' or simply 'justifications'?
Suggestion: a justification; justifications
...tion rate. On the other hand, there is a justifications that the cars will become less for use ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 511, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
..., I still strongly believe that much of this tasks will be unsuccessful and in twent...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, still, well, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, no doubt, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2231.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 462.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.829004329 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86184595861 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493506493506 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 13.0 3.08781362007 421% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7713410844 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.409090909 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 5.45110844103 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220380892312 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077637910557 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650266366109 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138979657099 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289715873157 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.