If teachers explain advantages of subjects outside of school to their students, they will be more interested in learning about them.
Nowadays, we have lots of universities or school with specific methods for teaching. One of the special methods that some teacher used is that they clarify positive points regarding students major that would be practical for them. Thus, students will attract to their lessons. From my point of view, teachers should mention positive effects of student’s courses on their future lives in order to increase student’s concentration and motivate them as well. My arguments for these points are explained as follows.
First, if the professor states the advantages of students major, students will be focus on their lessons in the best way so they try to attention to their units because they know that their lessons will be useful for them in the future. In addition, they can figure out the concept of their majors. If teachers use everyday examples, students will understand their major better. For instance, teachers may say that if you have a considerable ability in mathematics, you are able to go to a great job as a result you can receive high income. Therefore, pupils certainly will devote a lot of time in order to do their math assignments in the best way.
Second, teachers can motive their students if they specify the positive results of student’s courses on their future lives. Consequently, students will not reluctant to go to school. In other words, they ready themselves so as to learn new things in the classroom therefore at the morning they are not feel tired so they can awake readily without any reluctance. Furthermore, graders will tried to work hard because they know that for achieving success they should have notable background. For example, students in the marketing field should know that if they want to be successful in the future and earning lots of money, they should have striking knowledge about customer services or how to treat with customer and so on.
All in all, from what I have discussed, these days, we witness plenty of universities around us that each of them has special plans for teaching. In this way, some instructors prefer to clarify the advantages of courses for their students to increase their tendency to learn about them. In my opinion, if teachers explain the positive results of student’s lessons on their lives would be great for pupils since not only can graders encourage but also they are able to focus on their majors properly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
.... In other words, they ready themselves so as to learn new things in the classroom there...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'try'
Suggestion: try
...y reluctance. Furthermore, graders will tried to work hard because they know that for...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, of course, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00496277916 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69897631541 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491315136476 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8971340438 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.055555556 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3888888889 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1111111111 5.45110844103 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299187457213 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108351272741 0.076458572812 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589384656007 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207408400202 0.150856017488 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283058735909 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.