Imagine that a professor requires students as much as possible about a subject in a short period of life. It is better for the professor to require students to work together in a group or is it better to require students to work alone?
People in different jobs and positions have different opinions and policies whenever they want to make decisions, university's professors in particular. Opinion are divided as to whether students work together or alone when there is considerable amount of time pressure. However, personally speaking, I take the view that it is much more beneficial for students to work together due to some reasons. I will ellabreate upon momentous reasons in the following paragraphs.
First, should students work together, they will share their knowledge and their information. It has been said that two minds are better than one. I take the view that students can exchange their experiences and information through working together. The repercussion of this policy is a well-done work. To pave the way for this example, I would like to give an example of this. When I was studying in the University of Technology one of the well-known universities in my country, we had to do our assignments in our Commerce class as a team because of this we could do our best inasmuch as we shared our knowledge and our information. having done the assignments in the team, we could gain a high mark. In a word, should students be required to work together, there would be a significant increase in their performances.
Second, the work will be done in shorter period of time if a group of students work on it at the same time. It goes without saying that there is much less time for accomplishing a task when several people rather than one get involved, apart from the quality of the work. It is my firm conviction that under considerable time pressure students should be required to work as a team. According to resent research conducted by Isfahan University of Technology one of the pioneer in social science, the more works are done in the team, the less time would be required to finish the work; class work is not an exception. The researchers concluded that tanks to team works students can save a significant amount of time which can be used in other aspects of their life. Hence, group works is the key to do the projects on time especially when time pressure is added.
In the final analysis, according to above-mentioned points and examples, it is a forgeon conclusion that it is much wiser a decision students will be asked to work in a group when there is not plenty of time available for dedicating to the projects; not only would it be useful for delivering too high-quality an assignment, but would it be useful for finishing the project on time. Then, why not accept this fact that it is better to make students work in a team whenever time is not sufficient for doing a task.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...sors in particular. Opinion are divided as to whether students work together or alone when th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 635, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Having
...ared our knowledge and our information. having done the assignments in the team, we co...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...econd, the work will be done in shorter period of time if a group of students work on it at th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, then, well, apart from, as to, in particular, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2215.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77370689655 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82745396952 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463362068966 0.524837075471 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.0 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.2465371392 48.9658058833 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.75 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317266941645 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107611586087 0.076458572812 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725598647461 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198829594849 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339214977933 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.