Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
•Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
•Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade.
•Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Some people believe if you make mistake it is better to correct it at the moment while some others disagree. I side with the former group because not only do I show my motivation to learn, but also I will correct my classmate understanding. In addition, it helps to change mood of mine.
Following illustrations, demonstrate this opinion,
First, the sense of self correction plays crucial role in the learning process. In fact, if people pay attention to their mistakes, they are encouraged to improve their information. Moreover, obtaining beneficial data, persons can develop their life in a positive way. For example, once I was presenting a lecture about physics that my classmate pointed out an error about a picture which was in my presentation. In this case, I did not realize this mistake. Additionally, I was curious about what I did mistakenly. Therefore, I stopped my presentation and corrected it enthusiastically by helping of my teacher. Thus, the correction of the mistake motives me to learn more and more.
Second, many issues may be affected by a simple mistake. Indeed, some mistakes that occur in public can change mind of other person adversely. Put differently, when one does a fault the minds of other persons are inclined to that wrong way. For instance, a time when I was in the university, my professor who taught a course about optics expressed a part of book incorrectly. Apart from that mistake, my classmates and I misunderstood that part of the book. Following that, one of my classmates told the teacher to correct that. Consequently, my professor did not let students misunderstand that part and wrote it in exam correctly.
Lastly, these kinds of interrupts help me to change my mood and continue my own presentation with positive sense. Actually, if audiences convey a boring feeling, the lecturer does not keep on speaking excitedly. In other words, the audiences' questions help the lecturer to improve the quality of the presentation. As an example, my master thesis was about fiber optics. Actually, the question in the middle of the speech was not acceptable. However, my professor asked a question and interrupted my lecture. Thanks to this pause, I could change my mood and brought back my concentration. Therefore, I completed the presentation of my thesis perfectly.
In conclusion, I would rather stop and change my fault than others. This is due to my sense, to learn passionately and correct my classmate misunderstanding. Additionally, it helps me to improve my sense when I give a lecture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...al data, persons can develop their life in a positive way. For example, once I was presenting a l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03317535545 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11546764967 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528436018957 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 666.9 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5752247097 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.2413793103 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5517241379 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.03448275862 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0635825467516 0.236089414692 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0193250677102 0.076458572812 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293187688133 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0499416146007 0.150856017488 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307980321396 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.