Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 1. Interrupt and correct the mistake right away; 2. Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader; 3. Say nothing.
Education has a tremendous impact on our lives and well-being. It enhances our success in immeasurable ways because it encompasses our core. Therefore, if the teacher or meeting leader says something incorrect, I think it is better to wait till the class is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher because it will be more ethical to do that than any other way.
First of all, our teachers are our idols. In fact, it is unethical to embarrass him in front of the people. For example, when I was at the university, my chemistry professor made a mistake in the class about some article, and I was sure that he was incorrect because I already studied this material online. I remember when he made and said something wrong, I did not do anything in the class. When the course finished, I stayed outside to talk to him and told him his mistake politely. I realized that he freely accepted my comment. Moreover, this behavior made him more friendly to me, and we became respect each other more and more because he appreciated my attitude. Hence, correct the teacher's mistake separately is the foundation of successful behavior.
Second, when the professor makes a mistake, and someone corrects him individually, this thing gives him the opportunity to search for the right thing. Indeed, this way will provide a vital chance for the teacher to find the appropriate answer. For instance, If someone tries to tell the professor about his mistake after the class, the professor could readily get the right information and makes a specific session to correct his error. Besides, this way will be more suitable for the students to learn the right thing because if the professor makes a particular session, this will help the students to remember the right thing easily because all the corrected information will stick in their mind. Therefore, the best way to correct the teacher's fault is to tell him the truth individually.
For the reasons mentioned above, from my perspective, it is more politely to inform the professor about his mistake after the class is finish. Hopefully, all students follow this strategy to improve the populace.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
1. wrong example:
when I was at the university, my chemistry professor made a mistake in the class about some article, and I was sure that he was incorrect because I already studied this material online. I remember when he made and said something wrong, I did not do anything in the class. When the course finished, I stayed outside to talk to him and told him his mistake politely. I realized that he freely accepted my comment.
because the topic sentence is:
it is unethical to embarrass him in front of the people.
need to use another example, like: our teacher got angry because somebody interrupts and corrects the mistake right away...and with bad consequences...
2. try not to use pronouns as subject, look at them:
when
I was at the university, my chemistry professor made a mistake in the class about some article, and
I was sure that he was incorrect because
I already studied this material online.
I remember when he made and said something wrong,
I did not do anything in the class. When the course finished,
I stayed outside to talk to him and told him his mistake politely.
I realized that he freely accepted my comment.
it has a lot of 'I'
3. No. of Different Words: 176 200
We are expecting:
No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 20 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 367 350
No. of Characters: 1736 1500
No. of Different Words: 176 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.377 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.73 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.563 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 119 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 100 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 38 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.389 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.485 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.556 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.318 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.509 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.166 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i think, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1789.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87465940054 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66413958866 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49591280654 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 563.4 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0337488177 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3888888889 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3888888889 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186713199971 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568926117332 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586049873467 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111132599512 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399884687361 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.