To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that education plays a vital role in our life for developing the technology. However, people are facing a myriad of educating issue. In this regard, individuals can make efforts in order to alleviate the situation. There has been no shortage of debates among scholar on whether the university should spend more money on salaries for university professors or not. Meanwhile, there is a tendency toward the notion that pay attention to teachers and professors living will yield more essential outcomes. As for this writer opinion I subscribe to this idea. In what follows, I will delve into most crucial reason to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroboration my stance in this subject is that universities professors should not have a concern about their salary. It is crystal clear that a professor with concern for a living could not be useful for the student. It is worth to say that the professor should do all of his best to be presents at university full energetic. By way of illustration, my university professor receives low money for one month working. Hence, they should have a second job. Accordingly, they could not do their best for training the student. Because half of their time spent with the second job. This example clearly illustrates the role of the full energetic professor in the university.
Furthermore, academicians and scholar have made significant progress in their recent researches that endorse the influence of full-time professor on student progressing in their field of education. It is crystal clear that a full-time professor spends most of his time in the university. Accordingly, a student could have more time to ask their question, search topic guidance and other material. At a case in point, my friend's supervisor is a full-time professor, and he is reachable all the time for his student. My friend goes to university every day and spends much time with his professor in order to finish his thesis. This example clearly illustrates my point.
The main conclusion to be drawn from this article is that the professors play a crucial role in educating the student. For the sake of brevity, a couple of points are worth reiterating: first, professors should receive enough salary to be energetic for educating the student; secondly, they should not have a second job for a living and should spend all of their time in the university. As for this writer's advice, I vehemently urge that university pay enough salary to the professors because they are training next generation. To put it briefly, I firmly contend that by evaluating the merits and demerits of the idea, not only it be recognized as an evidence-based hypothesis, but also it can be accepted speculatively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 547, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ing will yield more essential outcomes. As for this writer opinion I subscribe to ...
^^
Line 3, column 548, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...do their best for training the student. Because half of their time spent with the secon...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 400, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...eir time in the university. As for this writers advice, I vehemently urge that universi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 633, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...s and demerits of the idea, not only it be recognized as an evidence-based hypothe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, briefly, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, as for, in conclusion, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2323.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06100217865 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92371156091 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 732.6 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1102830543 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.92 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.36 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.48 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256473692976 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751638940178 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10266894406 0.0737576698707 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177873584871 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057053882514 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.