It is a waste of money for government to fundspace exploration. Do you agree or disagree?
The earth has been developed enormously with the advent of sophisticated technology. Parallel to this, deforestation, drought, greenhouse effects and so forth, are the fatal consequences of human activities that lead the world into a vulnerable place. Various points of view which are germane to the matter being discussed brings us to the moot question as to whether the government should allocate a vast sum of money for space exploration or not. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that travel and space exploration will be beneficial not only for human beings but also the entire world. The following paragraphs will aptly substantiate my personal viewpoint.
To commence with, all people living around the world know the importance of earth and its natural resources, which provide an opportunity for people to lead a long-lasting life. But we cannot take this idea for granted that these natural resources are interminable for humans' lives. Generally phrased, these resources will be finished as soon as possible and this shows that it is incumbent upon the government to dedicate a hoard of money to explore outer space. As a tangible example, water is the essence of life without which our lives seem to be paralyzed and people are really threatening the existence of water here on earth. So, this threat represents that government should fund space exploration to the extent that preserves the world and humans' living condition. To elucidate more on this issue, owing to the critical role that natural resources play, the government should yearly allocate a substantial amount of budget for space exploration. Not only can government achieve significant data through exploration but also can save more lives.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance in this subject is that funding travel and space exploration not only can save more lives but also can create crowds of job opportunities for those people who are seeking for a decent job. If we take a minute to ponder over it, space exploration requires many people to work and this could provide fertile ground for people to grasp the opportunity. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that although results of this fund by the government might take many years to be released, it will guarantee people's lives in near future owing to the fact that everything is unpredictable.
However, this is the one side of a coin. Funding space exploration might be waste of money and time due to the fact that hardly can predictions come true in real world. In fact, the government could allocate this amount of budget to the education and bend over backward to improve educational system through internet. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there is more reasonable ground that can lend weight to my personal stance.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 355, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...iscussed brings us to the moot question as to whether the government should allocate a vast s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 444, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... can lend weight to my personal stance. In light of reasons elaborated, I reiter...
^^^
Line 8, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, really, so, as to, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.0752688172 297% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2446.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07468879668 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80602867747 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514522821577 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 773.1 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0718520455 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.3 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125396593713 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397935139447 0.076458572812 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380965993395 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650253322766 0.150856017488 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398630594737 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.002688172 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.