A job should be a job for life. Do you agree or disagree?
One of the most important life decisions of one’s life is finding and choosing a career that suits both your capacities and needs. In particular, when the time to get a job comes, some people argue that a job should mean a job for life, but is that really so? In the following paragraphs I will try to illustrate the positive aspects of both having a job for a life and changing a job every couple of years. Afterwards, I will give my personal opinion on the subject.
The positive aspects of working on the same job for life time are many, one of them is being able to construct your career on the same field. In this case people could begin in the lower position and the climb to the highest as years go by. Another positive aspect could be getting to know your coworkers really well, and creating strong relationships. Also, when working on the same field, if people is good at what they do, they could also get recognized as the best of their area. Furthermore, they would develop a deep knowledge of their job field.
Contrary to the above, by jumping from one job to another every two or three years, people would gain varied experiences in different fields of their careers. They would also get constant stimuli of the novelty, which helps the brain stay fresh and rejuvenated. Finally, if a company should ever shut down, a person having a broader knowledge of different fields would have it easier to find another job than the person who always worked on the same field.
In order to illustrate the positive aspects of having a job for life I’ll give with my father’s example: my father, who works in the insurance field, has had the same job over the last 26 years. He is known for being good at what he does, and people trust him. Furthermore, he is what people would call “an expert on his field” and they would ask for his advice when they need it. Above all, he is happy and comfortable in his job. Contrary to this case I could give the example of my uncle, he is a Systems Engineer. He finds stimulating to learn different things every couple of years and always try to work for the same company or in the same position for no more than two or three years. Even though he does not spend enough time in a company to get promoted, his previous experiences allow him to get high work positions every time he feels the need for a change.
To conclude, I find more amusing the idea of working in different fields over the years. I personally need the thrill of the novelty and get bored by doing the same over a long period of time. I also believe that at the current time, is more important to be able to do many things. Furthermore, nothing is granted, not even the security of a life lasting job. For that reason, I do not believe that only having the experience of one field would be in advantage in case of needing to change a job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 441, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...le of years. Afterwards, I will give my personal opinion on the subject. The positive aspects...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
... aspects of working on the same job for life time are many, one of them is being able to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 178, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...get bored by doing the same over a long period of time. I also believe that at the current tim...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, really, so, well, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2357.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 530.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44716981132 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41790005067 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435849056604 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 738.0 618.680645161 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.994623655914 302% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0396431624 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2083333333 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.45110844103 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284031759786 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095789997344 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951479320792 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192916391587 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868753415392 0.0645574589148 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.53 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.