Learning about the past
Nowadays, most people try to learn new things in many fields since they know if they have enough knowledge they will achieve success in their lives. In this way, some people would rather learning facts by try new things. Actually, they want to encounter with new conditions while others prefer to learn by refer to the past. From my point of view, if people learn new fields by going back to past it would be better for them because they will be able to save their time and they will successful in their future lives as well. My arguments for these points are explained as follows.
First, if you try to learn new facts by going back to the past, you are able to save your time. You no longer need to face with new conditions in order to raise your experience you can use you previous experience so as to pass harsh problems. For example, if you are gone اگر رفته باشی to job when you were a child, you undoubtedly get familiar with many things such as how to treat with your colleagues. Therefore if you go to job now you know how to behave in your job atmosphere. Furthermore, if you refer to your past events, you are able to think in the deep way in order to solve your problems. As a matter of fact, you can analyze your past experience therefore you figure out that you should not repeat your last mistakes. For example, imagine that you get a bad score on your math midterm exams after that if you consider your mistakes you can focus on it as a result, in final exam you will not face with those mistakes again.
Second, by referring in past situations you will be successful in your life since you increase your knowledge regarding some special issues that they just happened in the past and today’s is unlikely to happen so just few persons are aware of it. Hence, you are ahead of other persons. Actually, your knowledge is more than your competitor. To give an instance, you can learn new mysterious facts such as how to earn money in the easiest way without any challenges from old books or from your grandfather.
All in all, from what I have discussed, these days, people want to be familiar with new things and increase their experience. Under this condition, some people prefer to learn by going back to their previous events that happened for them but others like to try new things. In my view, if people rely on their past events, it would be better for them since not only can they save their times but also they are able to achieve success in their future lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'learn'
Suggestion: learn
.... In this way, some people would rather learning facts by try new things. Actually, they...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...some people would rather learning facts by try new things. Actually, they want to ...
^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...nce you can use you previous experience so as to pass harsh problems. For example, if yo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...h as how to treat with your colleagues. Therefore if you go to job now you know how to be...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
... a matter of fact, you can analyze your past experience therefore you figure out that you shoul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, such as, you know, as a matter of fact, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 76.0 43.0788530466 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 83.0 52.1666666667 159% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2054.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 459.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47494553377 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27475603639 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437908496732 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1607802741 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.105263158 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1578947368 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57894736842 5.45110844103 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129894077156 0.236089414692 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057535700742 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615628416061 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994359016119 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424459277744 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 58.1214874552 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.