Learning from the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree?
Upon the question does learning from the past have value for people who live in the present, different people have different opinions based on their emotions, educations, cultures, etc. From my point of view, studying history has countless benefits for people. In the following paragraphs, I will try to explain my position more clearly.
First and foremost, we will learn valuable lessons if we study past. In my opinion, by reading historical books, people can learn how to become successful persons in their personal lives. For example, last year, I read an interesting book about a successful woman who lived in past centuries. She was a famous person in her country because she participated in numerous philanthropic activities. So, by reading that book I learned how to achieve success in my life and become a well-known person in my country.
In the second place, if we study history, we will not make similar mistakes. In my point of view, some mistakes are dangerous and people can avoid making them if they examine past carefully. For example, leaders and presidents should read historical books that are about previous kings and leaders. They can comprehend the most significant reasons of their failures and avoid repeating the same mistakes.
Last but not least, we can make our decisions easily and in a more convenient way if we have enough information about past. By understanding the main reasons of success and failures, we can make decisions quickly.
Taking all the aforementioned arguments into account, it can be concluded that people should study history because it has countless benefits for them. So, I strongly agree with this statement that learning from the past has value for people who live in the present based on the reasons which I outlined above.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, well, for example, in my opinion, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 15.1003584229 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 295.0 407.700716846 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05762711864 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7176971173 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542372881356 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3756847535 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.25 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192633799024 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646911509467 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853255650546 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119185631236 0.150856017488 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865993409993 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.