Many parts of the world are using important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific reasons and details in your answer.
Nowadays, fast developing industry destroys one of the most important natural resource on Earth- forests. In my opinion, the resource that needs to be saved in my country is forests. There are a few reasons why I feel this way.
The first reason for that is that abundance of forests provides tremendous consumption of the Carbon dioxide by trees, which is crucial to prevent enhancing of global warming. Almost every adult knows that the one of the reasons of global warming is increased amount of Carbone dioxide in the atmosphere. This creates a layer, which prevents heat from escaping the planet, and negatively affects life on Earth. For example, some animals cannot stand such as temperatures and become extinct. If people from the region protect forests from disappearing, the dramatic increasing of the world`s temperature could be slowed down. Although trees are important source of variety of products used by humans, it is important to remember that the major function of trees in our world is to serve as integral part of the ecosystem. This way, it is essential to save forests from deterioration` in order to preserve our planet for next generations.
Another obvious reason for protecting forests is that forests are habitats for scores of species of animals, birds, as well as insects. Eradication of forests abandon the place to live, and makes them to migrate in search of new areas. Not all of them are able to overcome such as challenges. The need for moving away could be eliminated, if people secure forests. Moreover, more new species could residue the land full of trees. For instance, as was written recently in a magazine, preservation of a forest in North America by a nonprofit organization, saved one of the twelve species of chip monkeys from disappearing. Therefore, people have to do everything possible to protect nature, even if it contradicts their financial interests. This is why it is so salient to elaborate different kind of programs to defend forests from decline.
To sum it up, the community should devoid time and finances to save forests. This is because forests, in a certain degree, protect Earth from global warming, and serve as home for variety of creatures. All things considered, it is reasonable to assume that preservation of forests is crucial for people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Carbone dioxide in the atmosphere. This creates a layer, which prevents heat fro...
^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... insects. Eradication of forests abandon the place to live, and makes them to mig...
^^
Line 4, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ation of forests is crucial for people.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i feel, kind of, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1943.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 384.0 407.700716846 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05989583333 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86247910404 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552083333333 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4894096061 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5238095238 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156618538007 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470546848974 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465426792908 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110202711007 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675029176402 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.