The more money a person has, the more he or she should give away to the charity
One of the greatest duty of us as a human being is helping poor individuals in our society. Nonetheless, nowadays some people misuse other people feeling and kindness and pretend like poor people in order to swindle these generous people. Therefore, as far as I am concerned, I wholeheartedly disagree with this statement for quite a few reasons, two monumental of which elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, quite a bit of people do not really need the money that they get from other people and they just get used to earning money without any trouble. Thus, I believe that should we give them that money, this detrimental culture will diffuse in our society. Moreover, in today's world, a great number of organizations and foundations are built in order to help poor people. With this in mind, they can identify people who need various kind of help, and give them sufficient money for their living expenses.
The other salient reasons which deserve some words here is that people can spend their money on other useful projects such as building hospitals, universities, libraries, to name but a few. Obviously, they can have a superior effect on their country by investing their money in these projects. Furthermore, affluent people can build a company and hire poor individuals as its workers. In this way, they can provide a steady job for them: as a result, they do not need to beg for money. Moreover, prosperous individuals can establish universities for the general public. However, they can exempt poor student from paying tuition. Consequently, these student can study in a prestigious university and they will be able to become valuable people for their country.
To sum up, even though helping poor people is a great feature of human beings, but it can be concluded that it is better for affluent people to spend their money on other projects and do not give their money to the charity. All in all, it is recommended that people assign a part of their income for improving welfare of their society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to like'
Suggestion: to like
...people feeling and kindness and pretend like poor people in order to swindle these g...
^^^^
Line 6, column 555, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...uals can establish universities for the general public. However, they can exempt poor student ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 644, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this student' or 'these students'?
Suggestion: this student; these students
...dent from paying tuition. Consequently, these student can study in a prestigious university a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, really, so, therefore, thus, kind of, such as, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90670553936 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66457310855 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527696793003 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9540519973 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.1875 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.45110844103 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0667835538218 0.236089414692 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0264726978851 0.076458572812 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366438230605 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0478962869827 0.150856017488 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038967574543 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.