Movies from your country is more interesting for you than movies from other countries
Nowadays, we witness lots of movies that are show around us. Some movies have plenty of viewer but other movies do not have considerable viewers. In this way, some people prefer to see the movies that are related to their culture while others would like to see foreign movies. From my point of view, if we see some movies that are near to our country would be better for us since we can realize the movie properly and we are able to save our money as well. My arguments for these points are explained as follows.
First, movies that are related to our culture will not be vague for us because actors in these movies speak together in native language. In other words, they do not speak in other languages. As a result we can understand the film readily. However, if you see foreign movies the languages will not the same as your mother language so you cannot comprehend the film. Furthermore, movies that recorded in our country are show the places that are exist in your country therefore the film will not be ambiguous for you. Actually, the concept of the film is not far away from you.
Second, if you see the movies from your country you are able to save your money. As a matter of fact, the cost of the local movies is lower than the cost of the foreign films. For instance, last week I went to cinema and I tried to buy ticket for new films that was recorded on the United States that was amazing for me that the cost of the foreign ticket was more expensive in comparison with other films that created on my country so I decide to buy ticket of local film in order to save my money. In addition, for watching foreign movies on your television you need special devices such as satellite. In fact, without satellite you will not be able to watch foreign films. However, for preparing satellite you should spend a lot of money.
All in all, these days, we have many films all around a world that each of them has special viewers. Some people would rather see movies that created in their countries while others like foreign films. In my opinion, local films would be beneficial for us because not only we can comprehend the films in the best way but also we are able to save our money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun viewer seems to be countable; consider using: 'plenty of viewers'.
Suggestion: plenty of viewers
...at are show around us. Some movies have plenty of viewer but other movies do not have considerab...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
..., they do not speak in other languages. As a result we can understand the film rea...
^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...ur country are show the places that are exist in your country therefore the film will...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 13.8261648746 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 406.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42610837438 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17026943081 2.67179642975 81% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.418719211823 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5648235602 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.85 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9 5.45110844103 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401283880307 0.236089414692 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133898741045 0.076458572812 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105746740954 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264803508919 0.150856017488 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102486441263 0.0645574589148 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.73 8.01818996416 84% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 86.8835125448 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.