nnnnnnnnnnnnn
The purpose of this article is to address the way to preserve the tree 'torreya taxifolia' from extinction. More specifically, the author gives three ways to preserve it. In the listening part, the professor disagrees with the methods. She believes these are not the best ways to preserve the trees from extinction and refutes each of the points stated in the reading.
The author begins the reading by stating that the first method is to reestablsih. The lecturer, on the other hand, is not convinced. According to her, the environment and climatic condition of Florida is not suitable for the tree in recent days. She continues by saying that due to the global warning the climatic condition has become unfavorable for the torreya taxifolia trees in recent days.
In addition, the author says that Torreya can be saved by relocating it into next places. Again, the lecture believes that author's suggestion is flawed.The speaker believes that the Torreya has high possibility to flourish it is relocated and keep other species of plant into danger.
Finally, the author suggests to preserve the plant to save it from extinction. In the listening part, the lecturer doubts that the method will work. She says that the plant should have to face different kinds of diseases. For that, diverse group of Torreya Plant should be kept in the lab. But it impossible to build such a large lab.
To summarize, both the writer and lecture have contrary views on preservation of the Torreya plant. It is clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 152, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ieves that authors suggestion is flawed.The speaker believes that the Torreya has h...
^^^
Line 4, column 21, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggests preserving'.
Suggestion: suggests preserving
...plant into danger. Finally, the author suggests to preserve the plant to save it from extinction. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, so, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1977.66487455 66% => OK
No of words: 264.0 407.700716846 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93181818182 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55503023906 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 212.727598566 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 618.680645161 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1102351134 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5882352941 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5294117647 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47058823529 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.