Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
It is incredible how people`s life has changed withing the last one hundred years. In the modern world, the fast developing technology benefits people in their daily routine. This way, in contemporary society, people are able to spend less time on cooking and consume much healthier food than their ancestors. Therefore, in my view, the fact that food has become easier to prepare undoubtedly has reflected the improvement of people`s life.
First of all, these days, people have more time for enjoyable activities. For example, as my grandmother told me, back in the past, she has to devote hours to food preparation. She has to bake bread on her own for the whole family. She did not have special appliances to help her and hence, the process of the backing was quite time-consuming. Conversely, today, I can bake the bread for my loved ones by using modern technology. For me, it is fast and easy – the only thing I have to do is to put the ingredients into the machine and turn it on. So, I have enough time left to play with my children and enjoy their company. To that end, if my grandmother had had the technology to help her out in the kitchen, she would have more free minutes to watch how her children had grown up.
Secondly, food has become healthier. Today, certain appliances are so advanced, that during the preparation, food saves intact all vitamins and other important for humans wellbeing components. For instance, I have a cooking machine that has a few temperature regimens for preparing different vegetables. The pen lets me cook the vegetables under the particular temperature that does not destroy nutritional components of the products. Therefore, I have never experienced vitamins` insufficiency. Moreover, I feel healthy and full of energy to move on with my life. Despite the opinion that a myriad of people today struggles with obesity and diabetes because of the tremendous growth of the fast- preparing foods, a quite significant amount of people avoids to consume the semi-finished products and use the modern technological advance in food preparation to preserve their health.
To conclude, I strongly believe that the change in food preparation is the pivotal advance for the modern humans. This is because nowadays, people are capable of spending more time on activities they truly enjoy and they have a chance to eat healthier. Here is no doubt that these benefits have increased people`s quality of life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 397, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...oday, I can bake the bread for my loved ones by using modern technology. For me, it ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 656, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...company. To that end, if my grandmother had had the technology to help her out in the k...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 784, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to watch how her children had grown up. Secondly, food has become healthier. Tod...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 758, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoids consuming'.
Suggestion: avoids consuming
...s, a quite significant amount of people avoids to consume the semi-finished products and use the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 890, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d preparation to preserve their health. To conclude, I strongly believe that the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, i feel, no doubt, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2058.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 411.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00729927007 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9152419208 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537712895377 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1207727339 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5454545455 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6818181818 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04545454545 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143986690243 0.236089414692 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456184570678 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530570060118 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109327230666 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674863334902 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.