One can learn a lot about a person from the book and movies that he like. Do you agree or disagree?
There are substantial number of people whom we have to communicate with them through our lives. Learning about people has of the greatest importance for having effective communication with them. There are monumental amount of ways useful for learning about them. Personally speaking, I firmly disagree with this statement that the best way for learning about a person is from the books and the movies that he likes since there are two better way for grasping some pieces of information about them. I will provide two important indicators which can be helpful for learning about others.
One of the most indicator worth mentioning would be people's behavior. It is crystal-clear that how people behave can reveal back ground information about them since every thing is rooted in some thing deeper. A prime example of my own experience may shade some light on this point. While studying in university, one of my classmates always respect our teachers and our classmates. So polite was a person that I supposed he has been raised with high-educated people. When I saw his parents for the first time, I understood my assumption was true. Had his parents been impolite themselves, he would have been too impolite a son either. In a word, raising in an appropriate situation, his behavior was wonderful and politeness was his strong point.
There is also a more subtle indicator of personality we should consider. It is common knowledge that what people wear and how they dress can talk loudly about them. To exemplify, I am working in several company as a freelancer. Not only do all of my co-workers dress modest, but also they behave so formal with each other in their communication. However, I am a member of an music group too. Members of this group often dress a little casually and they do not like to be so formal in their communication with each other. It is my firm conviction that people' personality can affect the way they dress; the further formal clothes, the less close relationships.
In the finall analysis, I firmly disagree with this view that the best way for learning about people is from the book and movies which they like, since there are far better indicators which we can grasp at the first glance. The first one is people' behavior and the second is the way that they dress. I am of the opinion that relying on people's interest for understanding their personality would not live up our expectation and would not provide reliable results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...ication with them. There are monumental amount of ways useful for learning about them....
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
...out them since every thing is rooted in some thing deeper. A prime example of my own exper...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun company seems to be countable; consider using: 'several companies'.
Suggestion: several companies
...out them. To exemplify, I am working in several company as a freelancer. Not only do all of my...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 374, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ommunication. However, I am a member of an music group too. Members of this group ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, while, i suppose
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2045.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85748218527 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70465704677 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496437054632 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6489524395 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9130434783 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3043478261 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78260869565 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243492351161 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644444425869 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739546397652 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153984940855 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686310372228 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.