In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to secure, successful future. Do you agree or disagree?
Undoubtedly, finding and commencing a job is an evitable and crucial juncture in the life of most people, because leading a gratifying life is not feasible without a job in today's world. People select diverse procedures in finding their ideal jobs according to their personalities, responsibilities, ages, and traditions. Various points of view which are germane to the matter being discussed brings us to the moot question as to whether in the past human beings were more successful when they opt for any given career. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that in today's hectic city of life people have different trials and tribulations when it comes to jobs and careers and they have to face many obstacles in order to succeed. The underlying aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reasons to shed light on a number of reasons in this framework.
To commence with, people have always been looking for a well-paid and a decent job in order to accumulate a hoard of money and become financially independent. Generally phrased, in the past years, human beings were successful when they plan to start any job owing to the fact that they have never experienced inflation and economic recession. As a palpable example, nowadays people take a skeptical attitude toward any job they want to start. Indeed, staggering cost, experiences of bankrupted companies, inflations and so forth, leave no doubt for this attitude. To elucidate more on this issue, start making a plan for a career depends on significant factors, which guarantee the success of the plan.
Another equally salient point in corroborating my stance is that people in the past were diligent, shrewd and they had a hard-working attitude to make a progress in their jobs. If we take a minute to ponder over it, in today's hectic world, due to the paucity of motivation and incentive, hardly people think of a plan for their future lives because they are inclined toward the opinion that future lives are unpredictable and no one could foresee what will happen in near future. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that individuals are reluctant to make a plan and take risks for their future careers owing to the lack of confidence and esteem. However, every coin has two sides. It is established beyond doubt that in recent years the number of jobs opportunity available for people has increased dramatically and if people have plans to run their own business, it is not necessarily needed to worry about future. As a personal example, last year I decided to work in civil engineering area because I have studied in a prominent university. After a year, myriads of projects got perfectly done because I planed everything successfully. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal perspective.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 425, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...iscussed brings us to the moot question as to whether in the past human beings were more succ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...hey had a hard-working attitude to make a progress in their jobs. If we take a minute to p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, look, so, well, as to, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 52.1666666667 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2464.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 498.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94779116466 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84569256278 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536144578313 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 791.1 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.118527709 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.684210526 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2105263158 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.84210526316 5.45110844103 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115992745656 0.236089414692 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325701034116 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0274272332068 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0626351646674 0.150856017488 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389670418122 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.