Population of people have progressed so we should not expect polite behavior
Nowadays, we witness the huge number of people in our society that each of them may have different culture or different language. In this way, some scientists believe that by considering this situation we cannot see polite behaviors between people. From my point of view, we will just see aggressive behavior in their society since the culture of people is various and in this condition people are not able to stand each other as well. My arguments for these points are explained as follows.
First, we have lots of culture in the world that they do not have any similarities with other cultures. For example, Chinese people can eat animal because it is related to their cultures but maybe a person from another country cannot eat cat for example. Therefore, if these people meet each other in the restaurant they will feel disgusting because of the misunderstanding. In addition, some behavior in some cultures do not have bad meaning but maybe in other cultures have negative meaning. For instance, if you twinkle by your eyes in the United States, that means you just want to show your positive interest. However, twinkling in another country such as Iran has a bad meaning. As a result, if an American person does this manner in Iran, maybe Iranian feel upset or angry.
Second, people cannot tolerate others, especially in crowded places. To give an example, in the public transportation some people are not able to stand others because they think others want to steal their wealthy things such as a cell phone so they may behave angry. Furthermore, with the huge number of people in the bus for example, you cannot find an empty chair to sit hence you should stand during your trip. Thus, at the end of the trip you undoubtedly feel bad or you may shout because you could not bear the harsh condition.
All in all, from what I have discussed, these days, we have a lot of different people in the world that each of them has various features. Under this condition, some researchers think that this notable population will have negative results in the society such as impolite behaviors. In my opinion, we will witness awful conducts in our country among people since not only have they variant culture but also they are not able to endure each other.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 392.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78316326531 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46506066955 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482142857143 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1098220002 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.166666667 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229102190975 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708669270275 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556119719089 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14585457929 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508798425592 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.