Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
When it comes to the issue the importance the old buildings, some people believe that these structures are history of the city and we should not destroy them. However, others have the opposite view and think that we can replace them with new buildings, which are more beneficial for people. As far as I am concerned the last point carries more weight. I take this position on account for the following reasons.
First and the most important reason is that modern people need new buildings for having continent life. In fact, we should aware of this point we never can live in the past, and sometimes we have to sacrifice some things for gaining better. In this matter, we can destroy the old buildings to make useful structures such as park, Movie Theater, concert halls, which are necessarily in the modern world. Therefore, we have to eliminating old buildings for having comfortable life, because human’s progresses always are associated with removing and creating new thing.
A further point e must consider is that replacing we can expand businesses, which will decrease the rate of unemployment. As we all know, the unemployment is a trouble crisis not only in small town but also in metropolises. Hence, it is quite normal that the local governments tend to perform any plan that could help for solve this problem. The old buildings usually are located in center of cities, where is best places for commercial activities. In this way, it would be a good plan to destroy old buildings and replace them to make new businesses like shopping centers, restaurants, malls. So, new businesses not only ameliorate the unemployment issue, but also assist the local government to have high revenue.
In contrast, let us to take a look on why some people dislike the idea of replacing old buildings with modern structures. These people think that old buildings are an integral part of the city’s history, so we have an obligation to protect them. I admit that it is a moral to preserve them, while preserving and reforming these kinds of building usually impose much money on the local government. In the small town the local government has not enough revenue to allocate a great budget for that. In addition, it the large cities, the lack of land forces us to think about destroying old buildings and use of their lands for other things.
All above evidence supports this undeniable fact that new buildings like university, library, shopping center could make people’s life comfortable and bring more job opportunities. Admittedly, as an English proverb goes “a coin has two sides”; therefore, those who take the opposite view are partly reasonable that old buildings are part of people’s memorial, and people like to preserve them. Nevertheless, I strongly that its benefits of this plan outweigh dangerous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
..., which are more beneficial for people. As far as I am concerned the last point ca...
^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: NEED_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'have to eliminate'?
Suggestion: have to eliminate
...rily in the modern world. Therefore, we have to eliminating old buildings for having comfortable li...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with removing and creating new thing. A further point e must consider is that ...
^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are usually
...r solve this problem. The old buildings usually are located in center of cities, where is b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.232175502742 0.229887763892 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.138939670932 0.158761421928 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.109689213894 0.0866891130778 127% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0530164533821 0.046263068375 115% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0530164533821 0.0685040099705 77% => OK
Prepositions: 0.107861060329 0.118717715034 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0237659963437 0.0351676179071 68% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78756853881 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0255941499086 0.0309702414327 83% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0968921389397 0.0887237588012 109% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0201096892139 0.0209618222197 96% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0146252285192 0.0139019557991 105% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2847.0 2387.08602151 119% => OK
No of words: 471.0 408.028673835 115% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04458598726 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.48200974243 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339702760085 0.338922669872 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.265392781316 0.251872472559 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.19957537155 0.174417080927 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.142250530786 0.112833075102 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78756853881 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515923566879 0.524397521467 98% => OK
Word variations: 60.2666249108 59.2087087015 102% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6684587814 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.4090909091 20.5533526081 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5836003358 48.84282405 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.409090909 120.699889404 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4090909091 20.5533526081 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.681818181818 0.644075263715 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.54480286738 72% => OK
Readability: 47.9483690407 45.7405998639 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.48507462687 1.45489161554 102% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255843424226 0.300154397459 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0848321877007 0.103427244359 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0531173364962 0.0752933317313 71% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.511807211612 0.497263757937 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.105224973161 0.151897553556 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100162215562 0.114077575197 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739718269405 0.0781384742642 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.38711350545 0.336927656856 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0645792533181 0.067059652881 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180263351769 0.210909579961 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331817425771 0.0618886996521 54% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.86379928315 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.4623655914 162% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.