Should governments make decisions about people's lifestyle, or should people make their own decisions?
The government is the main factor which makes decisions regarding finance, defence, and foreign; it is in charge of its nation and the prosperity of its citizens. Despite these heavy responsibilities, the government should merely interfere into people’s private lives to some extent due to some rational reasons.
To begin with, the government is taking its residents’ freedom away if it decides people’s lifestyle, which leads to severe consequences. To illustrate, Chinese government coerces its people to use the distinct Internet platform called Weibo; therefore, every behavior as well as statement of the citizens is strictly controlled, constraining Chinese people from showing their true self or eventually violating the right of freedom of expression. Consequently, this act of restraint results in some rebellions in the community. Another aspect under government control is religion. There are a myriad of religions and beliefs that exist in a nation, and each religion has its lifestyle distinction, especially in dressing. However, once the government imposes on ascetic people to calibrate their religious beliefs, it may lead to the insecurity among citizens and may disturb the peace of the nation.
Secondly, above everyone else, the citizens themselves know their true potential and learn to enhance them. Although the government can manipulate its citizens, through laws and rules, to create a better society, it cannot dive into the real power or come up with proper solutions to make people truly happy with what they are commissioned to do. A stable society only appears when its residents are satisfied with their lives but no restriction. Therefore, the government should let its citizens figure out the measures for their conundrums with which they are comfortable. For instance, there is encouragement to help poor citizens in quarantine, and my mother registered for a position as she wants to share her privileges with the unprivileged ones. My mother applied into food shopping for the poor; however, an officer gave her a task that was totally unsuited with her capability. As a result, my mother was very angry and she fluctuated about the idea of helping others.
On the other hand, it is allowed for the government to dig into the health care-matter of its citizens. In this day and age, people are so chasing for money that they do not keep an eye on their health. In this situation, the assistance of the government to improve the health status of residents is rational and necessary.
In conclusion, over interference of governments intended for citizens is not acceptable because it violates the Democracy right in every aspect. However, it is indisputable that there are some facets, especially health care, which requires the support from the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 593, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...rnment control is religion. There are a myriad of religions and beliefs that exist in ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... residents is rational and necessary. In conclusion, over interference of govern...
^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quires the support from the government.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2365.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 445.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31460674157 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95369644455 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559550561798 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 745.2 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6071937792 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45 5.45110844103 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240921496167 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061321924013 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505465049136 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124772053565 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722842817114 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.