Should governments spend more money on improving roads and
highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public
transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and
details to develop your essay.
The importance of transportation became extremely high nowadays. It is hard to imagine how people would live being not able to move from one part of the city to another, from one city to another, from one country to another. Transportation can be divided into two major types: public and private transport. Development of both types requires involvement of governments. To let people use their cars, governments should build new roads, maintain existing ones. To let people use public transportation, governments should invest in the development of new subway lines, buy new buses. Prioritizing, on what to spend money, governments, in my opinion, should give preference to public transportation. I think this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First, taking care of public transportation, governments make life more comfortable for much more people. The number of people, who can be transported by buses, trains and subway, is much greater than the number of people, who can move using their cars. For instance, in Moscow more than two millions people use metro every day, compared to this, the number of people who use their cars on daily basis is 40 times smaller. Even not taking into account those who use buses but don not take metro, we can see that the majority of people use public transportation. Hence, investing in metro and buses, the government satisfies needs of 40 times more people.
Second, as more transport on our streets, as worse the quality of air. If you look around, you will notice that in most of the cars there are maximum three passengers, at the same time one bus transports up to 80 persons. Considering that the negative effect on the air of one bus is equal to that of two cars, we can easily calculate how much more air pollution will be produced by cars, which transport the same number of people as bus does. For instance, last year ecologists calculated that if even 30% of the people who drive start using public transportation, than the level of air pollution in Moscow will decrease on 40%. The report was published in one of the famous newspapers and one of the parties started developing a project, a purpose of which was to increase the number of people, who use public transportation. The project has not been finished yet, but the lot of people already started using metro instead of cars and ecologists confirmed that the quality of air now is better. The example clearly shows that using public transportation, we can decrease a negative impact on out nature.
To sum up, I strongly believe that investing in public transport, such as buses, trains, metro is more important, because doing this governments not only helps the majority of people to live comfortably but also take care of our environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 998, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... that the quality of air now is better. The example clearly shows that using public...
^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... metro is more important, because doing this governments not only helps the majority...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'as to', 'for instance', 'i think', 'such as', 'in my opinion', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243494423792 0.229887763892 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.154275092937 0.158761421928 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0762081784387 0.0866891130778 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0483271375465 0.046263068375 104% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0278810408922 0.0685040099705 41% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133828996283 0.118717715034 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0390334572491 0.0351676179071 111% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.8233523866 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0278810408922 0.0309702414327 90% => OK
Particles: 0.00185873605948 0.00188951952338 98% => OK
Determiners: 0.0743494423792 0.0887237588012 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0260223048327 0.0209618222197 124% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0223048327138 0.0139019557991 160% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2795.0 2387.08602151 117% => OK
No of words: 474.0 408.028673835 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89662447257 5.86048508987 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48200974243 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339662447257 0.338922669872 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.227848101266 0.251872472559 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.160337552743 0.174417080927 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.10970464135 0.112833075102 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8233523866 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485232067511 0.524397521467 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 55.5184576885 59.2087087015 94% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.5714285714 20.5533526081 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0595668321 48.84282405 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.095238095 120.699889404 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.5533526081 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.644075263715 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 45.356238698 45.7405998639 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.8064516129 1.45489161554 124% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139067252044 0.300154397459 46% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.134703481582 0.103427244359 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.104970915559 0.0752933317313 139% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.518118876749 0.497263757937 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.187913365264 0.151897553556 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680683847288 0.114077575197 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664457674821 0.0781384742642 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.387820353228 0.336927656856 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0881969574306 0.067059652881 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114391083713 0.210909579961 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548443963997 0.0618886996521 89% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8870967742 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.91756272401 183% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.