Smoking in public places is banned by law in many parts of the world over the past few decades. Nowadays, there is a sparked heated debate that this rule is good or bad. However, in my opinion, it is better for the health of the people and the essay will provide arguments to support my perspective.
First of all, due to the cigarettes smoking, many people suffer from respiratory diseases such as breathing difficulty, asthma, and many more. In addition, It is provided that it is also injurious for the passive smokers as much as the active smokers and is also proven in the scientific research. Thus, as in offices and bus stops don't have enough air circulation, to smoke in those places is dangerous for the smokers and the others in the surroundings.
Furthermore, as tobacco smoking is an addiction, many individuals get distracted and need to take frequent breaks for smoking during working hours. Consequently, in many workplaces, it is prohibited because it affects the productivity and it may be irritating and harmful for other persons such as pregnant women or children in public places like hospitals and schools. Apart from that, It also causes lungs cancer. As there are thousands of people who dies over the world every year due to cancer, it should be banned in workplaces, hospitals, schools and bus stops as well.
To conclude, It is an undeniable truth that smoking kills thousands of people every year across the globe, enforcing smoking prohibition rule is better choice. Also the Government should ban smoking not only in public places and office buildings but everywhere. In addition, the sale and production of those products should be prohibited for people's good health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...arch. Thus, as in offices and bus stops dont have enough air circulation, to smoke i...
^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...king prohibition rule is better choice. Also the Government should ban smoking not o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, well, apart from, as to, in addition, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 285.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98947368421 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74034863086 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9729610303 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.384615385 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 5.45110844103 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211187842726 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780726420717 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588261065071 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138627264932 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597970380218 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.