Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why?
Many people in the world are facing the problem of scarcity, living without shelters, or even they are not luckiest to get their necessary things. All things only possible if you have sufficient money. Many peoples like beggars are wandering in search of food. Some people believe that giving money to beggars is the only solution to solve beggars' problems. However, on the other hand, I do not believe in giving money to beggars is an appropriate solution. First, giving money to them is not the only solution to helps them because whatever money we gave them is only sufficient for them for one day or some limited period. After that, they will again start the same routine. If we want to help them, then we should give them the advice to do hard work and get money from their job. For example, if you are the owner of a Multinational company then you can give a job in your company according to their qualification. Hence, to get money through hard work will last forever to them.
Second, some time beggars are asking money to do wrong things such as they may use this money for drinking alcohol, which is dangerous to health. We often get emotional by their face and pity appearance and give them money but they just showing us fake appearance. For example, I have seen beggars in Mumbai city, which belongs in India, they have luxurious houses, cars, and clothes, etc. They have more money than the normal middle cast family.
Third, the money given to beggars can be better spent on other charities. For example, five dollars may purchase a slice of pizza in a developed country. In the developing world, however, that same five dollars could purchase life-saving products, such as nets to ward off malaria, or nutrients to aid starving children. Rather than giving money to local beggars, it would be more just to save spare change during the year, eventually donating all of it to the developing world. That is where it can do the maximum amount of good. It is random that some people are close neighbors and others live far away. We owe moral obligations to people everywhere, however, because we are all human beings. For this reason, it is wrong to prefer helping local beggars rather than distant, starving strangers. We should always spend our money where it does the most good to the most people.
On the other hand, the beggars who are suffered from scarcity and they do not have the ability to work and provide food to their family then we should give them money. Additionally, the people who are physically handicapped then we should provide them money, food clothes, etc.
To sum up, It can be said that God gives every people to the same mind. So, people have to use their minds properly to fulfill their families' basic requirements rather than begging in front of peoples. A person who wants to help beggers then first he or she has to check beggar's background history so they can be prevented by fraud cases.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d provide them money, food clothes, etc. To sum up, It can be said that God gives...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, then, third, as to, for example, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2423.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 518.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67760617761 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33975002223 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490347490347 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 751.5 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6368760496 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5357142857 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299414412129 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905632206365 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740492826669 0.0737576698707 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171859316733 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761056612334 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.