Some people think that giving students time during a class to discuss ideas with each other is a good way to help students learn; others think giving students time for discussion is ineffective or a waste of time. Which idea do you agree.
As a matter of fact, teachers have always been worry about their classes. One of the most concerns in teacher's mind is about some discussions in their classes. Teachers who are responsible about students and classes have different opinions about managing a class. Some of them think that having some conversations during a class is a good way to teach students easier and some of them believe otherwise. In my view, I strongly believe that having some conversations during a class is a good way to teach students how they should communicate with each other. Also, there are more advantages such as having fun or understanding opposite ideas better.
First and foremost, having some debates or conversations during a class is a good way for children to learn how to communicate with other people in the society. Students will learn to hear other people's opinions and tell their ideas about any topic. Some students are shy, so these kinds of practice will help them to talk to other people and explain their reasons to support their ideas.
Second, children in school-age will learn to respect for other opinions. As everybody knows, each person has a separate idea, so people should learn to hear other opinions. Although hearing oppose thoughts is not easy, it can help students to be mature. Additionally, students will learn more. For example when a teacher suggest students to discuss about a topic, they will hear other opinions and sometimes they will find out that their thoughts are not correct, because of other student's points.
Last but not least, it is fun. Most classes are serious and students do not like that serious classes. Having a short discussion will help students to have fun and enjoy the class. For instance, I used to be in a high school back in my home country Iran, I had a nice teacher who was really creative. She was asking students to be in some groups and teach us by games. I can say that she did a great job in her course, because students had fun during her class and they tried to be as good as they can in their course.
To sum up, having discussion is not only a way to learn better, but also is a way to learn other skills like communications.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
have always been worry about
have always been worried about
having discussion is not only a way to learn better, but also is a way
having discussion not only is a way to learn better, but also is a way
flaws:
No. of Words: 386 while No. of Different Words: 174 //It means it has a lot of duplicated content
We are expecting:
No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 386 350
No. of Characters: 1758 1500
No. of Different Words: 174 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.432 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.554 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.451 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 111 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 79 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 54 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.381 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.883 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.476 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.328 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.53 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.141 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 57, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...g discussion is not only a way to learn better, but also is a way to learn other skill...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'for example', 'for instance', 'such as', 'as a matter of fact', 'in my view', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.223744292237 0.229887763892 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.166666666667 0.158761421928 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0867579908676 0.0866891130778 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0433789954338 0.046263068375 94% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0639269406393 0.0685040099705 93% => OK
Prepositions: 0.109589041096 0.118717715034 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0251141552511 0.0351676179071 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.60999308653 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0433789954338 0.0309702414327 140% => OK
Particles: 0.00456621004566 0.00188951952338 242% => OK
Determiners: 0.0753424657534 0.0887237588012 85% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.027397260274 0.0209618222197 131% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0114155251142 0.0139019557991 82% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2213.0 2387.08602151 93% => OK
No of words: 387.0 408.028673835 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71834625323 5.86048508987 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.31007751938 0.338922669872 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.219638242894 0.251872472559 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.149870801034 0.174417080927 86% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0645994832041 0.112833075102 57% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60999308653 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449612403101 0.524397521467 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.3302601643 59.2087087015 80% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6684587814 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.4285714286 20.5533526081 90% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3229137105 48.84282405 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.380952381 120.699889404 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.5533526081 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.619047619048 0.644075263715 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 40.392395718 45.7405998639 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.30833333333 1.45489161554 90% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377368752369 0.300154397459 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120090521156 0.103427244359 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.102815528472 0.0752933317313 137% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.498093995714 0.497263757937 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.181743902398 0.151897553556 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138501298342 0.114077575197 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806764563279 0.0781384742642 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.321313379745 0.336927656856 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.11781037406 0.067059652881 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252122812058 0.210909579961 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453493145193 0.0618886996521 73% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.75985663082 181% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.