Some people think governments should spend as much money as possible exploring outer spaces. Other people disagree and think governments should spend this money on our basic needs on earth. Which of these two opinions do you agree with?
Upon the question should governments spend money on basic needs or exploring outer spaces, different people have different opinions based on their education, culture, emotion, etc. From my point of view, each option has its unique advantages. Exploring outer spaces will provide us with first-hand information about other spaces but spending money on basic needs will help our country improve and prosper. So that I think the advantages of meeting basic needs outweigh the benefits of exploring other planets. In the following paragraphs, I will try to explain my position more clearly.
First and foremost, a good shelter is the most significant need after water and food. Currently, a lot of people live in small rented apartments in my country. The price of apartment is high and most people cannot afford an apartment. They have to move from one place to another each year. In my opinion, if government build new houses, the price of house will reduce significantly and more people can buy a house.
In the second place, my country suffers from food shortage, drought and negligible precipitation. So spending money on developing research centers for agriculture is very important. In this center, researchers will train farmers to irrigate their farmland with less water and other necessary techniques. In addition, they will manipulate the genome of wheat, rice and corn to make plants with better characteristics. These new plants are more resistant to drought and pesticides. Furthermore, they have essential nutrients so the need for better food will be eliminated and more people get access to foods.
Last but not least, both the quality and quality of water in my country is not satisfying. Many people do not have access to drinking water in remote areas. Besides, in some areas, water contains heavy metals like copper and iron which are toxic to humans. So that improving the quality of water is an important issue.
Taking all the aforementioned reasons into account, it can be concluded that meeting basic needs like good shelter, enough food and high quality water should be the first priority based on the reasons which I outlined above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 407, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...l help our country improve and prosper. So that I think the advantages of meeting basic...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...lity and quality of water in my country is not satisfying. Many people do not have access to drin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 257, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...per and iron which are toxic to humans. So that improving the quality of water is an im...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, i think, in addition, in my opinion, in the second place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12747875354 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.690624655 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56657223796 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4540300938 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1904761905 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8095238095 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04761904762 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271226945702 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662922592628 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789181838937 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132099559706 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102994898642 0.0645574589148 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => The average readability is low. Need to improve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.