Some scientists believe that students under the age of 12 should have different teachers every day like the students who are between 12-18 years old. Do you agree or disagree?
It goes without saying that in today’s complex world we live in, where helpful education would be an integral part of our lives for increasing quality of life, it comes as no surprise that efficient education of students should be noticed. However, how students are being educated at different ages has been a matter of contention among people. There are many who are in the conviction that students under the age of 12 should not have different teachers every day like the students who are between 12-18 years old. I personally concur with their idea. The rationale behind the thesis will be elaborated upon and exemplified in the ensuing paragraphs by focusing on three fundamental reasons.
One imperative reason coming to mind at first is that hiring various teachers in schools for students under 12, the government has to spend more money. In fact, it adds extra pressure on the budget of governments, so they have to devote more budgets for education students in this level. For the purpose of illustration, countries which employ diverse teachers for students under 12 expend more money for this work instead of using this budget for providing other facilities, i.e. insurance services, healthy lifestyles by preparing organic foods and the fresh air.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that if students under the age of 12 have been one teacher, they are controlled more efficiently. In other words, one teacher in continual days meets these students, and he/she will be familiar with diverse personalities and behaviors of them, so he/she can use specific approaches for each of the students, and behave them based on their characteristics. For instance, having some ADHD students, he/she conducts them according to their conditions patiently.
Despite the fact that reasoning presented in the preceding paragraphs provides ample substantiation for my stance on the thesis, there is yet another reason that is of equal importance. Under the age of 12, students learn general knowledge in various lessons, i.e. math, literature, science and etc. As a matter of fact, one teacher who educates at this level can cover whole of them because they do not need very specific knowledge.
To put in a nutshell, taking all of the aforementioned ideas into consideration, it can be safely assumed that by employing one teacher for educating students under the age of 12, governments not only spend fewer budgets, but also they exert a good manner of learning at schools in this level. So it is highly suggested that countries include this idea in their education programs for growing learning of students under the age of 12 judiciously.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cording to their conditions patiently. Despite the fact that reasoning presente...
^^^
Line 7, column 223, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to general'
Suggestion: to general
...ce. Under the age of 12, students learn general knowledge in various lessons, i.e. math...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...lessons, i.e. math, literature, science and etc. As a matter of fact, one teacher who ed...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey do not need very specific knowledge. To put in a nutshell, taking all of the ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 30, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...edge. To put in a nutshell, taking all of the aforementioned ideas into consideration...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, as to, for instance, in fact, as a matter of fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2235.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12614678899 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77846407134 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548165137615 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.1993573558 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.6875 100.406767564 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.6045352989 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328961218187 0.236089414692 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128084205568 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166011190927 0.0737576698707 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187313768745 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810414539401 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.