Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays youngsters became more motivated to get valuable education. They have a huge desire to receive appropriate knowledge. The meaning of education differs from one to another. That is to say, people have different points of view about how educational process should be. A huge part believes, that in order to get all necessary information and skills one should be involved in discussions and have no lectures, while another part proves , that this method is ineffectual and study process should be composed only with lectures.
The first aspect to consider, professor gives all the essential information on lecture, explains different theories, uses specific reasons and examples to clarify the topic.It will give students correct direction. Moreover, students without solid knowledge will not be able to understand and consider given issue correctly, that will lead to fallible decision. However, students who are regularly involved in debates are tend to think critically, demonstrate themselves. Furthermore, they are able to think independently.
When I was studying history, my friend wanted to have some discussions. Our teacher was not against. For one month we only had debated and no lectures. Its consequence was that the whole class not only became independent, but also easily demonstrated their considerations. Nor mention, that they gained valuable knowledge. However, this knowledge was not complete. Our class missed very interesting and necessary information. It caused, that huge part of classmates incorrectly perceived the given materials and were at a crossroads.
All things considered, we shall conclude, that it is preferable to have lectures and no discussion. At first, students should get completed education, in order to be assured in their correctness. It is obvious, that every person has different point of view, but without knowledge they will make incorrect decisions. The most persuasive decision is that students should establish discussion clubs, invite their lecturers and have debates.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 441, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e no lectures, while another part proves , that this method is ineffectual and stu...
^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...asons and examples to clarify the topic.It will give students correct direction. ...
^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... clarify the topic.It will give students correct direction. Moreover, students wi...
^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...o are regularly involved in debates are tend to think critically, demonstrate themse...
^^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...strate themselves. Furthermore, they are able to think independently. When I w...
^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...derations. Nor mention, that they gained valuable knowledge. However, this knowle...
^^
Line 7, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n clubs, invite their lecturers and have debates.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 308.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62012987013 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00067894134 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.2451965879 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4285714286 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6666666667 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7619047619 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179255448546 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410501781623 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456330025982 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101017771464 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394714403818 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 58.1214874552 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.72 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.