Some university professors let their students choose their research topics themselves. Some do not. Which one do you think is better? Why?
Since entering university, Students’ mind has been occupied with how they choose an appropriate research title during the study period. In this regard there is a fierce controversy as to whether professors should let students pick their research topics or not. Some have good reasons to opt for the first point of view of this heated discussion, and an equal number of reasons to choose the second standpoint. As far as I am concerned the privileges of selecting a research subject by professor of university substantially outweigh those of the other side of coin. There are manifold reasons for this claim, among which experience of professors as well as need of science world are the most significant ones which are mentioned hereunder.
One rationale to endorse my point of view is that professors knows the strengths as well as the abilities of student better, and they fully recognize what the student could achieve or not. To clarify, the student might make a wishful decision concerning picking a research topic, so then who will take the responsibility of such a sightless choice? In addition, a professor is utterly aware of his own knowledge and strengths. The professor cannot take the risk of a subject which is completely out of his circle of knowledge, inasmuch as it is the matter of his academic validity within science societies. In contrast, it should be noted that students are scientifically naïve, and they are usually blind towards topics. It may be true that professors should respect the student’s interests in regard to doing research, but this could cause irrecoverable consequences that nobody can deny them.
The second striking point which is remarkably worthy of being highlighted here is the requirements of today’s science world. It is very pivotal that the subject of a scientific survey should be picked in a proper direction; that is, it must not be repetitive or a duplication of works of other scientists. A case in point is when the student selects an old as well as saturated subject to do. In this case, there is no opportunity for neither professor nor student to develop such kind of topic. Besides, not only should a research title not be saturated, but also should have a bright future for next progressions. Apart from a few exceptions regarding choosing the topic by students which have led to astounding and brilliant outcomes, there is no evidence in favor of this matter.
In summary, with all this taken into account, I believe that picking the topic of a research at universities and colleges by professors rather than students is more reasonable on the grounds that professor have a great number of experiences in selecting topic of surveys, and he can thoroughly consider the needs of science world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...is regard there is a fierce controversy as to whether professors should let students pick the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 416, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...easons to choose the second standpoint. As far as I am concerned the privileges of...
^^
Line 4, column 83, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...nt, I believe that picking the topic of a research at universities and colleges by profess...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, may, regarding, second, so, then, well, apart from, as to, in addition, in contrast, in summary, kind of, as well as, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2311.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01301518438 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93457214359 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531453362256 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 710.1 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.8990826556 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.388888889 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6111111111 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94444444444 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278753507608 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821286425934 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580994200934 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165896929785 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527424569957 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.