Teachers are responsible for motivating students. Agree or disagree?
Motivation is the most potent catalizer for learning new subjects. Although it is mostly an internal job, external factors, including teachers, can have an eliciting effect on it. I strongly believe that the main job of a teacher is not only to convey the new knowledge to the young minds, but also to motivate them so that they become eager to learn. Education is a delicate mental process and motivation boosts it dramatically. I have several reasons to consider the teachers capable of and responsible for such a booster.
First of all, teachers have a unique position in students’ lives. In younger age, students copy them as role models. I remember when I went to the elementary school my classmates and I could not imagine an earthly life for our teacher. She was a god in our eyes and we followed her instructions the same way of divine messages. She helped us to adopt our own way in solving problems, and encouraged us to explore the world around. Having a highly awed position, teachers can inspire and evoke their students to find their interests and develop their capacities.
Second, students spend a considerable number of hours at schools, in close contact to their teachers. Consequently, they are influenced by their teachers beliefs, attitudes, and approaches. They have the opportunity to fuel the imagination and creativity among students. For example, a well-designed field trip can make students enthusiastic about seemingly boring topics. I chose to become a dentist after having a short visit of a dental clinic, arranged by my teacher.
Finally, teachers are educated to become capable of manipulating and directing the students’ minds. They know psychology and education technology. They are equipped with all the necessary measures for helping students to build their self-images, to be confident to themselves, and to follow their own paths with no hesitation. Teachers are mind mentors, and who else can motivate a student better than a mind mentor?
In a nutshell, students can extract information from a diverse list of resources. There is no need to have a teacher to give lessons to. Teachers should be more than only a data conduit, filling the students’ memory with knowledge. In fact, they should train the children to become knowledgeable and eager to learn. Therefore, I have no doubt that teachers’ primary responsibility is motivating students to learn.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in fact, no doubt, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15267175573 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96884962136 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577608142494 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8518005958 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.72 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324619916275 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913605141644 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758575846892 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189678968955 0.150856017488 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367627984664 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.