Teachers are responsible for motivating students to learn.
I strongly believe that the main job of a teacher is to convey the information to the young minds, but it is motivating them so that they become eager to learn. Education is a delicate mental process and motivation boosts it dramatically. I have several reasons to consider the teachers capable of and responsible for such a booster.
First of all, teachers have a unique position in students’ lives. In younger age, students copy them as role models. I remember when I went to the elementary school my classmates and I could not imagine an earthly life for our teacher. She was a god in our eyes and we followed her instructions the same way of divine messages. Having a highly awed position, teachers can inspire and evoke their students to find their interests and susceptibility, and follow their individual paths.
Second, students spend a considerable number of hours at schools, under close contact to their teachers. Consequently, they are influenced by their teachers beliefs, attitudes, and approaches. They have the opportunity to fuel the imagination and creativity among students. For example, a well-designed field trip can make students enthusiastic about seemingly blaring topics. I chose to become a dentist after having a short visit of a dental clinic, arranged by my teacher.
Finally, teachers are educated to become capable of manipulating the students’ minds. They know psychology, and education technology. They are equipped with all the necessary measures for helping students to build their self images, be confident to themselves, and follow their own paths with no hesitation. Teachers are mind mentors, and who else can motivate a student?
In a nutshell, students can extract information from a diverse list of resources. There is no need to have a teacher to give lessons. Teachers should be more than only a data conduit, filling the students’ memory with knowledge. In fact, they should train the children to become knowledgeable and eager to learn. Therefore, I have no doubt that teachers’ primary responsibility is motivating students to learn.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in fact, no doubt, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 337.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24035608309 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05013622886 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584569732938 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.799572916 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2727272727 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3181818182 20.6045352989 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36363636364 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447954810344 0.236089414692 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123477081998 0.076458572812 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106378697702 0.0737576698707 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257337135757 0.150856017488 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080777855247 0.0645574589148 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.52 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.