Torreya taxifolia,
The author in the passage is concerned about the possible extinction of Torreya species which is why she/ he has provided three possible solutions to mitigate the issue. Surprisingly, the speaker in the lecture seems to be at odds with her/ his strategy. She goes on to dismiss not only the first solution which was restablishing plant in same area, but she also condemns the other two options of assisteed migration as well as preservation in research centres.
As the writer attempts to establish the point of view that the humid microcliamte of North America supports the growth of these species, they should be planted again at same regions, the orator points out that this is no longer valid. She goes on to elaborate that this microcliamte is gettign affected by the surrounding less humid cliamte in that region possibly due to global warming or the fact that the region is getting drier. This is why the first solution of the writer will no longer be valid.
Moving further, the lecturer goes on to contend the second option of assisted migration of the plants by pointing it out as a possible threat. When the author suggested to move the plant into colder Northern region since the microclimate is more favourable there, the speaker brings light into the context by giving the example of similar previous attempts and its failure of planting Black Locust Tree. Not only did it grow expansively but it also imposed threat to other endangeres plants.
Now, these cotnenetions were not enough to dismiss the essayist already,the speaker pulls one final string as the ultimate to condemn the last point on preservation of species in the research centre. According to the orator, this solution is nto practical because the large population of the Torreya species won'tbe able to withstand the diseases wehn sotred in research labs as they are genetically diverse and the centres can't accomodate them all. In this way,the final solution is dismissed as well.
So, it is in this manner, that the possible solutions of the essayist are weakened through the explanations on each proposed options as changing microcliamte, threat of endangering other species and risk of low disease resistance, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggested moving'.
Suggestion: suggested moving
...t as a possible threat. When the author suggested to move the plant into colder Northern region s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...t enough to dismiss the essayist already,the speaker pulls one final string as the u...
^^^^
Line 7, column 424, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...are genetically diverse and the centres cant accomodate them all. In this way,the fi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 461, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...es cant accomodate them all. In this way,the final solution is dismissed as well. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04632152589 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70934858536 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547683923706 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.1386678198 48.9658058833 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.461538462 100.406767564 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2307692308 20.6045352989 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0371919221373 0.236089414692 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0133472964376 0.076458572812 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031410278555 0.0737576698707 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0201670063491 0.150856017488 13% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247066045532 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.