Since the end of last century, a lot of criticism of the young generation has diffused through out the world. Till now those young people have been yet labeled as “selfish”, “apathetic” and “lazy”. Particularly, someone point out that, the youth are tepid in their participant in community activities. However, such a presumptuous judgment neglects the simultaneous change of human society, and deliberately covers the contributions made by the young.
Decades ago, frequent exchanges within one community were significantly in need as to ensure the quality of people’s daily life. The youth regarded as the most energetic group, therefore, should take more responsibilities to contribute to the whole community. Whereas, time has changed, with the boom of service industry and the great development of artificial intelligence, people became more autonomic—we are not like people before need much physical help from our neighbors. For example, before, the old in one community might need young people to take care of their daily life. But recently, we have more service agencies to look after the old. Staffs there are well educated and have rich professional knowledge about how to take account of the aged. Moreover, people are liberated from tedious housework—we have cleaners to sweep the floor and dishwasher to wash the dirty plates, and, those artificial machines are also easy-use for the old. In this sense, people now are more independent than ever before, and need less help from the outside. Hence, it could be understandable that the youth reduce their work time in the communities.
Although the development of technology and a finer division of labor free us from some bland work in a community, young people attempt to contribute more to the community and do what they could do as they are. If we look around, we could find those cherubic teenagers active in kindergarten, nursing home and orphanage—playing with kids, accompanying the lonely old and brining their own books and clothes to those orphans. For instance, several friends of mine, even though they are quite busy with their academic study, they still keep going to a nursing home every weekend to cook with those old, and have lunch together. Also, they go to a local kindergarten each month to play with those kids: teach them drawing and recognizing the national flags. The youth are doing more than we expect, and they do care about the others, especially those who are vulnerable. Therefore, it would be prejudicial and unfair if we yet claim that the young people nowadays have not put in the time to their communities, and ignoring effort they made.
Society should be more lenient to the youth, at least, not harsh. On one hand, we should understand the change of the world, and the potential influence such a change might bring to our life. We could not falsely conclude the development of our human society into complain about the teenagers. On the other hand, we should notice and admit every attempt made by the young people—they are doing their best.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...sm of the young generation has diffused through out the world. Till now those young people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'points'.
Suggestion: points
...etic” and “lazy”. Particularly, someone point out that, the youth are tepid in their ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the contributions made by the young. Decades ago, frequent exchanges within o...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... their work time in the communities. Although the development of technology a...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ties, and ignoring effort they made. Society should be more lenient to the yo...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'well', 'whereas', 'as to', 'at least', 'for example', 'for instance', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.212014134276 0.229887763892 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.143109540636 0.158761421928 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.104240282686 0.0866891130778 120% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0547703180212 0.046263068375 118% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0512367491166 0.0685040099705 75% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116607773852 0.118717715034 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0371024734982 0.0351676179071 106% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.9406327289 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0318021201413 0.0309702414327 103% => OK
Particles: 0.0017667844523 0.00188951952338 94% => OK
Determiners: 0.100706713781 0.0887237588012 114% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0212014134276 0.0209618222197 101% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00530035335689 0.0139019557991 38% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3087.0 2387.08602151 129% => OK
No of words: 503.0 408.028673835 123% => OK
Chars per words: 6.13717693837 5.86048508987 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48200974243 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.318091451292 0.338922669872 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.24055666004 0.251872472559 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.186878727634 0.174417080927 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131212723658 0.112833075102 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9406327289 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528827037773 0.524397521467 101% => OK
Word variations: 63.7976563634 59.2087087015 108% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6684587814 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.8695652174 20.5533526081 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6987340209 48.84282405 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.217391304 120.699889404 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8695652174 20.5533526081 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.739130434783 0.644075263715 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 45.9252312214 45.7405998639 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.46808510638 1.45489161554 101% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263211488155 0.300154397459 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0955564151408 0.103427244359 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0497007610318 0.0752933317313 66% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.525543541261 0.497263757937 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.099750310157 0.151897553556 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108044032389 0.114077575197 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411558939919 0.0781384742642 53% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.454012400893 0.336927656856 135% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0519927187244 0.067059652881 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185720738603 0.210909579961 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552924599424 0.0618886996521 89% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8870967742 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 8.42114695341 131% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.4623655914 203% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 18.0 13.6433691756 132% => OK
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.