TPO-30: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the recent days, many people are finding most of their time spent on work, leaving them exhausted for most hours and longing for a schedule that would enable more hours dedicated to rest and leisure activities. When it comes to working hours, I think there are many different preferences. Some would rather short hours of office time every day on the weekdays, so they could have a few hours to designate to relaxation, their family and friends or other activities each day. Others might prefer a job requiring them to work long, laborious hours so they could have the rest of the week to themselves. Each of these work habits might be more appropriate for different types of characters, and also for people in different stages of life. For example, if you are a student, you might prefer to work only three days a week, enabling you to schedule your classes and studies on your free days. Whereas if you have a family, especially young children, you might sense the need to attend to their necessities every day, so you might be obligated to choose a schedule which entitles you to several free hours each day to tend to your family. I personally, would prefer to have a job in which I would have to work long hours for three days.
As a person who likes to engage in many leisure activities, such as art classes and volunteer activities, I think this schedule is more fitting. Working every day will leave you fatigued after words, draining your vigor and leaving you with the need to rest for the remaining hours. So realistically, you will have no actual time to tend to other activities. Moreover, many classes and activities are schedules in a way that they coincide with work hours, leaving you with a limited choice of events you can carry out on your free time. So for persons who desire to be enrolled in a range of artistic, academic, volunteer and social activities, I think a schedule which leaves you with more free days during the week is better suited.
Also, in a job where you only have to work three days, you can plan for a vacation much easier. Having extra free days during a week can eliminate the process of asking the superiors for permitted leave or having to work extra hours, when you are agreed to taking several days off. Thus, you are faced with more choices and better opportunities for long vacations. Also, you can freely schedule your short trips during the week in a way that permits you to get home in time to rest, freshen up, attend overdue undertakings and be ready for work in time. By and large, people who love to travel may find this schedule more beneficial to their desires.
In general, I think various people, in different stages of life, may find one of the either work schedules, three days of long hours in contrast to working five days with shorter hours, more preferable. But I think younger, more active employees who are not bound by family obligations can better benefit from a schedule that entitles them to more free days during the week.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...mes to working hours, I think there are many different preferences. Some would rather short ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, whereas, for example, i think, in contrast, in general, such as, by and large, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2470.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 535.0 407.700716846 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61682242991 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80937282943 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41575751199 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.418691588785 0.524837075471 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 768.6 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.0624856688 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.65 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473970490012 0.236089414692 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174023234986 0.076458572812 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936969052925 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322896312366 0.150856017488 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0847402661785 0.0645574589148 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 58.1214874552 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.