Teachers have always concerned to assign projects for students as a team working project. On the other hand, students have always afraid of individual projects, because they do not want to lose all grades by making a mistake and they do not have a feedback in individual projects, so they prefer to work with other classmates. Many evidence are existed that shows team working is a helpful way to understanding better, because of following reasons.
First and foremost, students are in a big competition together. They want to excel each other anyway, so they will try to bring many useful material for each project. Students want to show that they are qualified as a member of the group. Consequently, they will spend more time to prepare enough data for their assignment. Spending more time and energy in each project will help them to be expert in that topic.
Furthermore, students are challenged by each other in a group. They will ask each other some tricky questions to be sure that other members know enough about that topic, so they will encourage each other to understand better and deeper. For instance, my brother-in-law was in a group to work on a school project two years ago. He decided to change the selected topic, so he asked some tricky questions of other members to show them the topic is confusing and they should change it. Another member of that group, love the topic and he spent hours to find some answers to these questions and he got it. Finally, all members learned a lot about that topic, because of those challenges.
Last but not least, students will ask various questions in a team. In some individual project, everybody will do a certain job and there is no doubt. One the other side, in a team, students will ask questions frequently. This aspect is one of the essential factors for learning. Learning by search is an effective way to answers questions.
To sum up, undoubtedly, students will learn more by more challenges and more competition. These kinds of things will help them to learn deeper and better.
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 166 200
Reason 1 and reason 2 are duplicated. You can apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all speaking/essay topics.
or You can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all speaking/essay topics.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 18 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 354 350
No. of Characters: 1645 1500
No. of Different Words: 166 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.338 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.647 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.488 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 109 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 80 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 53 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.845 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.301 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.529 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.098 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 327, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun evidence seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much evidence', 'a good deal of evidence'.
Suggestion: Much evidence; A good deal of evidence
...y prefer to work with other classmates. Many evidence are existed that shows team working is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['anyway', 'but', 'consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'so', 'for instance', 'no doubt', 'to sum up', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.200923787529 0.229887763892 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.184757505774 0.158761421928 116% => OK
Adjectives: 0.080831408776 0.0866891130778 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0461893764434 0.046263068375 100% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0531177829099 0.0685040099705 78% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108545034642 0.118717715034 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0415704387991 0.0351676179071 118% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.59441752738 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0461893764434 0.0309702414327 149% => OK
Particles: 0.00230946882217 0.00188951952338 122% => OK
Determiners: 0.103926096998 0.0887237588012 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0277136258661 0.0209618222197 132% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00692840646651 0.0139019557991 50% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2266.0 2387.08602151 95% => OK
No of words: 389.0 408.028673835 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82519280206 5.86048508987 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.48200974243 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.331619537275 0.338922669872 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.241645244216 0.251872472559 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.174807197943 0.174417080927 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.107969151671 0.112833075102 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59441752738 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47557840617 0.524397521467 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 50.7748240029 59.2087087015 86% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6684587814 111% => OK
Sentence length: 16.9130434783 20.5533526081 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1367954294 48.84282405 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5217391304 120.699889404 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9130434783 20.5533526081 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.521739130435 0.644075263715 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.5376344086 154% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 41.0775678999 45.7405998639 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.23577235772 1.45489161554 85% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331821786184 0.300154397459 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.122553769446 0.103427244359 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.098566531308 0.0752933317313 131% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.543182193928 0.497263757937 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.198013341251 0.151897553556 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116942712832 0.114077575197 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153106817685 0.0781384742642 196% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.240859625896 0.336927656856 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.134053559276 0.067059652881 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253368443585 0.210909579961 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.217885030903 0.0618886996521 352% => Less connections among paragraphs
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.91756272401 142% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.4623655914 41% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.75985663082 254% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.