There are certain considerations everyone can take into accout to investigate and examine the students' learning efficiency in group or alone. While someone contends that it is more effective for students to learn alone, I assert group work will absolutely promotes their efficiency, for not only it provides an opportunity for cooperation and communication between students, but also creates an atmosphere of proper competition.
First and foremost, no one can deny the fact that every individuals have their own advantages in terms of skills and talents, and cooperation makes sure everyone can make the most contribution to the work. When working together, each member in a team can be responsible for the part they are best at, making their work more effective. If a student deals with a project by himself, he will spend lots of time learning something he does not know before, which is a waste of time.
Furthermore, communication is another noticeable factor, for it stimuluses team members' inspiration, helping them to come up with the best solution together. For instance, brainstorm is a quite powerful strategy used by many organizations. Group members will gather together to talk about their thoughts on their work freely, during which many innovative solutions that promote the project greatly are likely to occur. It is the exchange of ideas among different people that matters most in brainstorm, which is impossible if one works alone.
Finally, an additional support comes to my mind is competition among group members, which stimulates students' efficiency greatly. In a group, everyone wants to make more contribution to the team, and this pressure can be converted to motivation to drive them work harder. But a point worths notice is that there must be a reasonable evaluation system designed by the teacher. If the teacher solely focuses on the performance of the group as a whole without paying attention to each member's contribution to the job, it is likely that no one want to work hard for the team.
For the aforementioned ground, I firmly believe for students, work in a group is definitely more effective than work on their own.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'promote'
Suggestion: promote
...ne, I assert group work will absolutely promotes their efficiency, for not only it provi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...ticeable factor, for it stimuluses team members inspiration, helping them to come up wi...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 483, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
... whole without paying attention to each members contribution to the job, it is likely t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1671388102 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93051240579 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56940509915 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9316995872 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.285714286 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2142857143 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206950658831 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744378888278 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451386138456 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124582061306 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298727684944 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 10.002688172 210% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.