No one could deny that there is an increasing importance in the approaches to improving the productivity and efficiency of companies due to the rapid growth of the economy and society. Some people believe that the workers are more concentrated and satisfied when they do similar jobs all time. However, I am not an advocate of that view since I think that varied tasks can not only improve the satisfaction of employees but also spur them on better performance.
Firstly, long-term constant work would make it easier for workers to be distracted. The employees will be tired of doing the same things, saying the same words, or even wearing the same clothes every day, and thus lack enough enthusiasm and get distracted easily. Routine works seem boring after some time. Instead, the varied tasks can spur them to learn new things and to apply the new skills into other works, which means they might experience new things and challenges almost every day, making life more colorful. Hence, they will concentrate wholly to what they are doing and about to do, which, in turn, obviously give them sense of fulfillment and achievement, thus leading to an improvement of satisfaction.
Furthermore, in this competitive world, versatile development of the employees is an essential foundation for future career satisfaction. Varied tasks enable the workers to acquire a large amount of knowledge from different domains and contributes to their versatile growth, in which way more creative idea would come into mind. If we keep focusing on the same work all the time, we tend to stop our brain storm process and eventually cannot develop new ideas about the task, which apparently constrain their satisfaction. This environment may cultivate a similar way of thinking among the workers, which means they cannot think out of box, thus stifling their creativity. For instance, Steven Jobs, an iconoclastic entrepreneur, has followed his intuition and studied a calligraphy course when he dropped out the Reed College. Yet it is this seemingly unpractical task that revolutionize personal computer industry and provide the customers with multiple and beautiful fonts and typefaces. If Jobs kept just focusing on computer theories, he may not be able to achieve this accomplishment.
In conclusion, just as the argument I mentioned above, in order to improve the satisfaction of employees and create a more passionate work environment, the employer need to encourage them to finish varied tasks and experience different works.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2119.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23209876543 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88435436037 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587654320988 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1746948172 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.4375 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3125 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215152757344 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065475302053 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684170808717 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130721267859 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348840092898 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.