It is not uncommon that students or employees, in today’s society, are brave enough to doubt the teachers and leaders or to lead to a fierce discussion. Some people believe that correcting the mistakes right away is unreasonable since it would disturb both the classroom and meetings’ discipline and the speakers’ plans. Nevertheless, in my view, immediate correction in a class or meeting can be beneficial to both speakers and listeners.
First and foremost, raising questions and correcting mistakes in class are beneficial to the students’ understanding and discerning of the knowledge. On one hand, in some cases, what teachers utter disorients and confuses many students. If we ignore these questions, it would be a waste of time to reconsider and ask teachers later and make it harder for students to get in tune with teachers in the rest of class in the meantime. Instead, if we interrupt the teacher immediately, not only can we find out whether the teacher made a mistake, but the teacher can help us reinforce the knowledge and better understand the confusing point. On the other hand, some of the problems are misstatements. Avid students who have a good command of knowledge can be aware of the mistakes and correct them by themselves while the other students who are comparatively less prominent may not. Therefore, interrupting and correcting mistakes in class can be considered as a significant way to boost the students’ study efficiency.
Moreover, it is universally acknowledged that meetings will serve the best function with the positive interaction between the employees and their managers. Immediate correction is an essential reflection of this kind of interaction, which can contribute to bringing the abilities and wisdom together. As for employees, survey results have revealed that employee involvement in the meeting and their desires to express themselves are appropriate to their career prospects, indicating that not expressing disagreement in the meeting definitely enjoys no merit. As for employers, nowadays we can see increasing welcome to the corrections and differing ideas among managers. In this way, the managers can find out the involvement of their workers and stimulate creativity, preventing employees from being embarrassed from raising questions. If the managers behave like their business opponents on today’s typical television talk show, manifesting themselves in meaningless rhetorical bouts and shouting matches, during which opponents vie to have their own message heard but have little interest in acknowledging the merits of others viewpoints, the company cannot be able to obtain a sustainable and healthy growth.
Finally, instead of ruining the discipline and speakers’ thinking plans, the immediate interruption and correction is an essential indication of enthusiasm and passion of listeners, which can help create a more vibrant atmosphere. It does not matter whether the speaker made a mistake since listeners under is situation are no longer treated as passive receptacles of predigested ideas but creators of new thoughts. Obviously, this kind of contribution cannot be realized by remaining silent or asking after classes or meetings. That is why the conventional education and meeting activities have been abandoned and teachers prefer the teaching style of talking and discussion rather than instilling endless knowledge to their students’ minds. Thus, in-class or in-meeting corrections are essential.
In summation, based on these advantages, it is wise and encouraged for students and employees to give corrections in classes or meetings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...acher immediately, not only can we find out whether the teacher made a mistake, but...
^^^
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...the confusing point. On the other hand, some of the problems are misstatements. Avid studen...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, while, as for, kind of, in my view, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 38.0 13.8261648746 275% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3105.0 1977.66487455 157% => OK
No of words: 556.0 407.700716846 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5845323741 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85588840946 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22347269694 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 295.0 212.727598566 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530575539568 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 936.9 618.680645161 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2002275112 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.136363636 100.406767564 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139627350939 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455084223663 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327723157072 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0819667259549 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388909832132 0.0645574589148 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 11.7677419355 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 58.1214874552 65% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 164.0 86.8835125448 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes. We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.